[START RECORDING]
FEMALE VOICE: This podcast has been prepared exclusively for institutional wholesale professional clients and qualified investors only, as defined by local laws and regulations. Please read other important information which can be found on the link at the end of the podcast episode.
MICHAEL CEMBALEST: Good morning everybody. This is the October Eye on the market podcast. We have 3 topics this week that we’ve written about. The first is a quick discussion of U.S. tech IPO performance. The second takes a look at what’s happening with the trade war in China as it wears out its welcome in DC. And then the third is a special Eye on the market section on the full contour of progressive democratic policy proposals given the rise of Senator Warren in the polls. First on, on the tech IPO situation, there’s been a lot of headlines recently on struggles of certain technology companies in the IPO market and in the pre IPO market. And those, those headlines are justifiable for the situations they’re describing. What I think got lost in the shuffle here is that most technology IPOs are doing just fine. And what are struggling are tangential tech companies that are included in the broad tech category but which are not really technology. If you look at them more closely. So we have a chart here that looks at all the different technology IPO’s in 2018 and 19. And what you see is that the companies that deliver software as a service model, usually on a B to B basis and cloud-based, deliver their products at close to 0 marginal cost and have sharply increasing returns to scale and most of those IPOs are doing quite well. The marketplace companies which have a transactional sales model and a lot of usually substantial ecosystem third party costs, subcontracted sales forces, subcontracted workforces. Those are the companies that are, that are struggling a little bit. So take a look at the chart. I think it speaks for itself, but I think the headlines recently have obscured a little bit of what’s going on in the underlying tech IPO market which is pretty good performance of real software technology companies. Then on, after Labor Day we wrote an Eye on the market on the trade war and Trumpism. And our conclusion is that we think equity markets are range bound by what the president is doing and that the upper end of that range is around 3000 on the S & P. So the latest news I think confirms that because, A, we’re starting to see even more policy proposals that are negative for global trade and, B, we’re actually starting to see actual economic data confirm the impact of the trade war on some global manufacturing data. So, on the policy front, the latest thing that’s happened, that I don’t know if it’ll actually get enacted, but it’s just a sign of the times, Senator Rubio proposed delisting Chinese companies that don’t comply with US accounting regs. And of course in 2013, the Chinese had signed that agreement allowing U.S. regulators to get audit working papers from Chinese companies and that, of course, never got enacted. And Rubio also proposed banning any federal retirement account from investing in portfolios that have benchmarks with Chinese exposure. So, the conclusion on this front is that the most important chart that we may have in here on the trade is the one showing that with 2 decades since China joined the World Trade Organization, it’s still the most mercantile country in the world. And at this point, they have very few friends left in Washington on either side of the aisle to defend them. And they’ve got a lot of detractors in the private sector as well. So the best outcome I can imagine for now is a narrow deal sometime early next year, mostly based on agriculture given all the problems that China is having in its agricultural sector. And by the way, in another blow to global trade, the WTO has now authorized the U.S. to put tariffs on a small amount, about 8 billion, of European goods to compensate the U.S. for unfair EU subsidies to Airbus. So, again, it’s a small number but there’s always the risk that there could be some retaliation by the EU. On the hard data side, we’re seeing a weakness in CEO confidence manufacturing surveys around the world, but we’re seeing a lot more strength in the U.S. consumer and the US service sector. And so that’s a dichotomy that I don’t think can last forever. And I think Trump’s playing with fire here’ cause we actually started seeing both in the U.S. and Germany for the first time in the cycle. Some weakness in manufacturing capital spending is now flowing through into the service sector. So I, I still don’t expect a recession in the United States in 2020. But there are increasing signs that this trade war is hurting not just the manufacturing sector, but maybe starting to bleed into services as well. We’ll see. As for China, one of the growth trackers that we look at, that looks at electricity production, and exports, and highway traffic, was running at about 7% growth in just a year and a half ago and is now down to 4%. So, this trade war is hurting China as well. So as it relates to the special section in the Eye on the market this month we were going to call it the Warren commission, but we decided on Warren Peace. President, Senator Warren has risen both in the polls and also in betting odds markets. Warren has almost a 50 % share in an aggregation of betting markets compared to 20 % for Biden and 10 % percent for Sanders. So, I thought it was a good idea to review the broad range of democratic progressive policy proposals that have been advanced by Senator Warren and others which she might adopt along the way. So there is a whole bunch of charts and tables in here that look through those policies, including a deep dive we’ve done on the proposal to tax unrealized capital gains each year. But one thing is clear, and this is a chart we at first included last December for the first time. If you look at the history of congressional voting records, since the very, since the beginning of the 20th century and you can go all the way back to the first Congress in the 1780s. And we looked at it over the last, let’s say 120 years. Senator Warren occupies a place on this empirically derived chart that is considerably to the left of any democratic president and also to the left of Democrats that aspired to become president as well, including people like Walter Mondell, McGovern and Humphrey. Anyway, take a look at this chart, take a look at the table. It walks through progressive policy proposals on taxation, the corporate sector, labor market, student debt, energy, healthcare, anti-trust, et cetera. And so we put a lot of effort in trying to capture the broad contours of these things. It was a really interesting discussion on how the federal government might tax unrealized capital gains each year, how they would deal with non-tradable assets like residential commercial real estate. We discussed as well the potential impact of a day 1 federal ban on hydraulic fracturing, which has to be put into the context of the fact that the U.S. now gets 60 to 80% of all its oil and natural gas and natural gas liquids from hydraulic fracturing processes and that they collectively account for around 40% of total U.S. primary energy consumption. So anybody proposing a ban on hydraulic fracturing, would probably need to have a pretty robust plan of what would they would do on day 2. We take a look at antitrust in the tech sector, specifically. There has been a really, up until about a year ago, the rate of FTC and Department of Justice antitrust enforcement on the tech sector was much lower than all other sectors and there is a lot of signs that that may be changing. And so that’s something that we need to understand. And then lastly, we take a look, a closer look at the prospects of a repeal in the U.S. corporate tax rates and additional windfall taxes on the corporate sector and the impact that that could have on the equity markets and corporate inversions. So, obviously we’ll be tracking more of this in the years ahead. I saw one thing that was an interesting reminder about how to be cautious with early polls. I think in 2003, the leader in the Democratic polls at this point in the process was Wesley Clark. In 2008, the leaders in the leader in the Republican Party was Giuliani and leader in the Democratic Party was Hillary Clinton. And then in 2011, the leader in the polls in the Republican Party was Rick Perry. So, we’re early in the process. But somehow I think the dynamic is a little bit different this time and it’s time to take a close look at the Senator Warren’s proposals, which is what we do in this week’s notes. So, thank you for listening and we will talk to you again next time.
FEMALE VOICE: Michael Cembalest, Eye on the market, offers a unique perspective on the economy, current events, markets and investment portfolios. And is a production of J.P. Morgan Asset and Wealth Management. Michael Cembalest is the chairman of market and investment strategy for J.P. Morgan Asset Management, and is one of our most renowned and provocative speakers. For more information, please subscribe to the Eye On The Market by contacting your J.P. Morgan representative. If you’d like to hear more, please explore episodes on iTunes or on our website. This podcast is intended for informational purposes only and is a communication on behalf of J.P. Morgan institutional investments, Incorporated. Views may not be suitable for all investors and are not intended as personal investment advice or a solicitation or recommendation. Outlooks in past performance are never guarantees of future results. This is not investment research. Please read other important information which can be found at www.JP Morgan.com/disclaimer-EOTM.
[END RECORDING]
敬请提供有关您的个人资料,我们的客户服务团队人员将会与您联络。
了解更多成为摩根大通私人银行客户的详情。
敬请提供有关您的个人资料,我们的客户服务团队人员将会与您联络。
主要风险
本文件仅供一般说明之用,可能告知您JPMorgan Chase & Co.(「摩根大通」)旗下的私人银行业务提供的若干产品及服务。文中所述产品及服务,以及有关费用、收费及利率均可根据适用的账户协议而可能有变,并可视乎不同地域分布而有所不同。所有产品和服务不一定可在所有地区提供。如果您是残障人士并需取得额外支持以查阅本文件,请联系您的摩根大通团队或向我们发送电邮寻求协助(电邮地址: accessibility.support@jpmorgan.com )。请参阅所有重要信息。
一般风险及考虑因素
本文件讨论的观点、策略或产品未必适合所有客户,可能面临投资风险。投资者可能损失本金,过往表现并非未来表现的可靠指标。资产配置/多元化不保证录得盈利或免招损失。本文件所提供的资料不拟作为作出投资决定的唯一依据。投资者务须审慎考虑本文件讨论的有关服务、产品、资产类别(例如股票、固定收益、另类投资或大宗商品等)或策略是否适合其个人需要,并须于作出投资决定前考虑与投资服务、产品或策略有关的目标、风险、费用及支出。请与您的摩根大通团队联络以索取这些资料及其他更详细信息,当中包括您的目标/情况的讨论。
非依赖性
本公司相信,本文件载列的资料均属可靠;然而,摩根大通不会就本文件的准确性、可靠性或完整性作出保证,或者就使用本文件的全部或部分内容引致的任何损失和损害(无论直接或间接)承担任何责任。我们不会就本文件的任何计算、图谱、表格、图表或评论作出陈述或保证,本文件的计算、图谱、表格、图表或评论仅供说明/参考用途。本文件表达的观点、意见、预测及投资策略,均为本公司按目前市场状况作出的判断;如有更改,恕不另行通知。摩根大通概无责任于有关资料更改时更新本文件的资料。本文件表达的观点、意见、预测及投资策略可能与摩根大通的其他领域、就其他目的或其他内容所表达的观点不同。本文件不应视为研究报告看待。任何预测的表现和风险仅以引述的模拟例子为基础,且实际表现及风险将取决于具体情况。前瞻性的陈述不应视为对未来事件的保证或预测。
本文件的所有内容不构成任何对您或对第三方的谨慎责任或与您或与第三方的咨询关系。本文件的内容不构成摩根大通及/或其代表或雇员的要约、邀约、建议或咨询(不论财务、会计、法律、税务或其他方面),不论内容是否按照您的要求提供。摩根大通及其关联公司与雇员不提供税务、法律或会计意见。您应在作出任何财务交易前咨询您的独立税务、法律或会计顾问。
关于您的投资及潜在利益冲突
在摩根大通银行或其任何附属机构(合称「摩根大通」)管理客户投资组合的活动中,每当其有实际或被认为的经济或其他动机按有利于摩根大通的方式行事时,就可能产生利益冲突。例如,下列情况下可能发生利益冲突(如果您的账户允许该等活动):(1)摩根大通投资于摩根大通银行或摩根大通投资管理有限公司等附属机构发行或管理的共同基金、结构性产品、单独管理账户或对冲基金等投资产品时;(2)摩根大通旗下实体从摩根大通证券有限责任公司或摩根大通结算公司等附属机构获取交易执行、交易结算等服务时;(3)摩根大通由于为客户账户购买投资产品而收取付款时;或者(4)摩根大通针对就客户投资组合买入的投资产品所提供的服务(服务包括股东服务、记录或托管等等)收取付款时。摩根大通与其他客户的关系或当摩根大通为其自身行事时,也有可能引起其他冲突。
投资策略是从摩根大通及业内第三方资产管理人处挑选的,它们必须经过我们的管理人研究团队的审批流程。为了实现投资组合的投资目标,我们的投资组合建构团队从这些策略中挑选那些我们认为最适合我们的资产配置目标和前瞻性观点的策略。
一般来说,我们优先选择摩根大通管理的策略。以现金和优质固定收益等策略为例,在遵守适用法律及受制于账户具体考虑事项的前提下,我们预计由摩根大通管理的策略占比较高(事实上可高达百分之百)。
虽然我们的内部管理策略通常高度符合我们的前瞻性观点,以及我们对同一机构的投资流程、风险和合规理念的熟悉,但是值得注意的是,当内部管理的策略被纳入组合时,摩根大通集团收到的整体费用会更高。因此,对于若干投资组合我们提供不包括摩根大通管理的策略的选择(除现金及流动性产品外)。
Six Circles基金是一只由摩根大通管理并于美国注册成立的共同基金,由第三方担任分层顾问。尽管被视为内部管理策略,但摩根大通不保留基金管理费或其他基金服务费。
法律实体、品牌及监管信息
在美国,银行存款账户及相关服务(例如支票、储蓄及银行贷款)乃由摩根大通银行(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.)提供。摩根大通银行是美国联邦存款保险公司的成员。
在美国,投资产品(可能包括银行管理账户及托管)乃由摩根大通银行(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.)及其关联公司(合称「摩根大通银行」)作为其一部分信托及委托服务而提供。其他投资产品及服务(例如证券经纪及咨询账户)乃由摩根大通证券(J.P. Morgan Securities LLC)(「摩根大通证券」)提供。摩根大通证券是金融业监管局和证券投资者保护公司的成员。保险产品是透过Chase Insurance Agency, Inc(「CIA」)支付。CIA乃一家持牌保险机构,以Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc.的名称在佛罗里达州经营业务。摩根大通银行、摩根大通证券及CIA均为受JPMorgan Chase & Co.共同控制的关联公司。产品不一定于美国所有州份提供。
在德国,本文件由摩根大通有限责任公司(J.P. Morgan SE)发行,其注册办事处位于Taunustor 1 (TaunusTurm), 60310 Frankfurt am Main, Germany am Main,已获德国联邦金融监管局(Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht,简称为「BaFin」)授权,并由 BaFin、德国中央银行(Deutsche Bundesbank)和欧洲中央银行共同监管。在卢森堡,本文件由摩根大通有限责任公司卢森堡分行发行,其注册办事处位于European Bank and Business Centre, 6 route de Treves, L-2633, Senningerberg, Luxembourg,已获德国联邦金融监管局 (BaFin)授权,并由 BaFin、德国中央银行和欧洲中央银行共同监管。摩根大通有限责任公司卢森堡分行同时须受卢森堡金融监管委员会(CSSF)监管,注册编号为R.C.S Luxembourg B255938。在英国,本文件由摩根大通有限责任公司伦敦分行发行,其注册办事处位于25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP,已获德国联邦金融监管局 (BaFin)授权,并由 BaFin、德国中央银行和欧洲中央银行共同监管。摩根大通有限责任公司伦敦分行同时须受英国金融市场行为监管局以及英国审慎监管局监管。在西班牙,本文件由摩根大通有限责任公司Sucursal en España(马德里分行)分派,其注册办事处位于Paseo de la Castellana, 31, 28046 Madrid, Spain,已获德国联邦金融监管局 (BaFin)授权,并由 BaFin、德国中央银行和欧洲中央银行共同监管。摩根大通有限责任公司马德里分行同时须受西班牙国家证券市场委员会(Comisión Nacional de Valores,简称「CNMV」)监管,并已于西班牙银行行政注册处以摩根大通有限责任公司分行的名义登记注册,注册编号为1567。在意大利,本文件由摩根大通有限责任公司米兰分行分派,其注册办事处位于Via Cordusio, n.3, Milan 20123, Italy,已获德国联邦金融监管局 (BaFin)授权,并由 BaFin、德国中央银行和欧洲中央银行共同监管。摩根大通有限责任公司米兰分行同时须受意大利央行及意大利全国公司和证券交易所监管委员会(Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa,简称为「CONSOB」)监管,并已于意大利银行行政注册处以摩根大通有限责任公司分行的名义登记注册,注册编号为8076,其米兰商会注册编号为REA MI 2536325。在荷兰,本文件由摩根大通有限责任公司阿姆斯特丹分行分派,其注册办事处位于World Trade Centre, Tower B, Strawinskylaan 1135, 1077 XX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands。摩根大通有限责任公司阿姆斯特丹分行已获德国联邦金融监管局 (BaFin)授权,并由 BaFin、德国中央银行和欧洲中央银行共同监管。摩根大通有限责任公司阿姆斯特丹分行同时须受荷兰银行(DNB)和荷兰金融市场监管局(AFM)监管,并于荷兰商会以摩根大通有限责任公司分行的名义注册登记,其注册编号为72610220。在丹麦,本文件是由摩根大通有限责任公司哥本哈根分行(即德国摩根大通有限责任公司联属公司)分派,其注册办事处位于Kalvebod Brygge 39-41, 1560 København V, Denmark,已获德国联邦金融监管局 (BaFin)授权,并由 BaFin、德国中央银行和欧洲中央银行共同监管。摩根大通有限责任公司哥本哈根分行(即德国摩根大通有限责任公司联属公司)同时须受丹麦金融监管局(Finanstilsynet)监管,并于丹麦金融监管局以摩根大通有限责任公司分行的名义注册登记,编号为29010。在瑞典,本文件由摩根大通有限责任公司斯德哥尔摩分行分派,其注册办事处位于Hamngatan 15, Stockholm, 11147, Sweden,已获德国联邦金融监管局 (BaFin)授权,并由 BaFin、德国中央银行和欧洲中央银行共同监管。摩根大通有限责任公司哥本哈根分行同时须受瑞典金融监管局(Finansinspektionen)监管,并于瑞典金融监管局以摩根大通有限责任公司分行的名义注册登记。在法国,本文件由摩根大通银行巴黎分行分派,其注册办事处位于14,Place Vendome, Paris 75001, France,在巴黎商业法院注册处的注册编号为712 041 334 ,已获法国银行业监察委员会(Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de resolution (ACPR)) 批准,并受ACPR及法国金融市场管理局 (Autorité des Marchés Financiers) 监管。在瑞士,本文件由J.P. Morgan (Suisse) S.A.分派,其注册办事处位于rue du Rhône, 35, 1204, Geneva, Switzerland,作为瑞士一家银行及证券交易商,在瑞士由瑞士金融市场监督管理局(FINMA)授权并受其监管。
就金融工具市场指令 (MIFID II) 和瑞士金融服务法 (FINSA) 而言,本通讯属广告性质。除非基于任何适用法律文件中包含的信息,这些文件目前或应在相关司法管辖权区内提供(按照要求),否则投资者不应认购或购买本广告中提及的任何金融工具。
在香港,本文件由摩根大通银行香港分行分派,摩根大通银行香港分行受香港金融管理局及香港证监会监管。在香港,若您提出要求,我们将会在不收取您任何费用的情况下停止使用您的个人资料以作我们的营销用途。在新加坡,本文件由摩根大通银行新加坡分行分派。摩根大通银行新加坡分行受新加坡金融管理局监管。交易及咨询服务及全权委托投资管理服务由(通知您的)摩根大通银行香港分行/新加坡分行向您提供。银行及托管服务由摩根大通银行新加坡分行向您提供。本文件的内容未经香港或新加坡或任何其他法律管辖区的任何监管机构审阅。建议您审慎对待本文件。假如您对本文件的内容有任何疑问,请必须寻求独立的专业人士意见。对于构成《证券及期货法》及《财务顾问法》项下产品广告的材料而言,本营销广告未经新加坡金融管理局审阅。摩根大通银行(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.)是依据美国法律特许成立的全国性银行组织;作为一家法人实体,其股东责任有限。
关于拉美国家,本文件的分派可能会在特定法律管辖区受到限制。我们可能会向您提供和/或销售未按照您祖国的证券或其他金融监管法律登记注册、并非公开发行的证券或其他金融工具。该等证券或工具仅在私下向您提供和/或销售。我们就该等证券或工具与您进行的任何沟通,包括但不限于交付发售说明书、投资条款协议或其他发行文件,在任何法律管辖区内对之发出销售或购买任何证券或工具要约或邀约为非法的情况下,我们无意在该等法律管辖区内发出该等要约或邀约。此外,您其后对该等证券或工具的转让可能会受到特定监管法例和/或契约限制,且您需全权自行负责确定和遵守该等限制。就本文件提及的任何基金而言,基金的有价证券若未依照相关法律管辖区的法律进行注册登记,则基金不得在任何拉美国家公开发行。任何证券(包括本基金股份)在巴西证券及交易委员会CVM进行注册登记前,均一概不得进行公开发售。本文件载列的部分产品或服务目前不一定可于巴西及墨西哥平台上提供。
应收件人要求及为收件人之便,本文件收件人可能已同时获提供其他语言版本。尽管我们提供其他语言文件,但收件人已再确认有足够能力阅读及理解英文,且其他语言文件的使用乃出于收件人的要求以作参考之用。 若英文版本及翻译版本有任何歧义,包括但不限于释义、含意或诠释、概以英文版本为准。
「摩根大通」是指摩根大通及其全球附属公司和联属公司。「摩根大通私人银行」是摩根大通从事私人银行业务的品牌名称。本文件仅供您个人使用,未经摩根大通的允许不得分发给任何其他人士,且任何其他人士均不得使用,分派或复制本文件的内容供作非个人用途。如您有任何疑问或不欲收取这些通讯或任何其他营销资料,请与您的摩根大通团队联络。
© 2023年。摩根大通。版权所有。
在澳大利亚,摩根大通银行(ABN 43 074 112 011/AFS牌照号码:238367)须受澳大利亚证券及投资委员会以及澳大利亚审慎监管局监管。摩根大通银行于澳大利亚提供的资料仅供「批发客户」。就本段的目的而言,「批发客户」的涵义须按照公司法第2001 (C)第761G条(《公司法》)赋予的定义。如您目前或日后任何时间不再为批发客户,请立即通知摩根大通。
摩根大通证券是一家在美国特拉华州注册成立的外国公司(海外公司)(ARBN 109293610)。根据澳大利亚金融服务牌照规定,在澳大利亚从事金融服务的金融服务供应商(如摩根大通证券)须持有澳大利亚金融服务牌照,除非已获得豁免。根据公司法2001 (C)(《公司法》),摩根大通证券已获豁免就提供给您的金融服务持有澳大利亚金融服务牌照,且根据美国法律须受美国证券交易委员会、美国金融业监管局及美国商品期货委员会监管,这些法律与澳大利亚的法律不同。摩根大通证券于澳大利亚提供的资料仅供「批发客户」。本文件提供的资料不拟作为亦不得直接或间接分派或传送给澳大利亚任何其他类别人士。就本段目的而言,「批发客户」的涵义须按照《公司法》第761G条赋予的定义。如您目前或日后任何时间不再为批发客户,请立即通知摩根大通。
本文件未特别针对澳大利亚投资者而编制。文中:
© $$YEAR 年。摩根大通。版权所有。
请浏览 FINRA Brokercheck网站以了解更多我们的公司及投资专才。
投资产品: • 不受联邦存款保险公司保障 • 非摩根大通银行或其任何联属机构的存款或其他负债,亦未获摩根大通银行或其任何联属机构的担保 • 存在投资风险,包括可能损失投资的本金
银行存款产品(例如支票、储蓄及银行贷款)及相关服务乃由摩根大通银行(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.)提供。 摩根大通银行是美国联邦存款保险公司的成员。并非借贷承诺。授信额度均须经信贷审批。
J.P.摩根私人银行的网站条款,隐私和安全政策不适用于您即将访问的网站。请查看其网站条款,隐私和安全政策,了解它们如何适用于您。 J.P.摩根私人银行不对此第三方网站上的任何产品,服务或内容负责(且不提供),但明确载有J.P.摩根私人银行名称的产品和服务除外。