Investment Strategy
1 minute read
Elections (and other geopolitical events) do not typically have a lasting impact on equity markets.1 But short-term impacts can be meaningful, and you’d be forgiven if you thought this time might be different.
There are as yet no significant updated policy initiatives proposed by the Harris campaign. At this point, we expect a continuation of the status quo under a Harris administration. However, the Republican party released its updated policy agenda during the Republican National Convention in July. Here, we analyze four key issues—trade policy, taxes, immigration and industrial spending—that could change the status quo should former President Trump be re-elected.
Former President Trump and President Biden have used tariffs (taxes paid by U.S. importers of foreign goods) to bolster national defense and increase the global competitiveness of domestic industries. Trump now advocates a 10% baseline tariff on all imported goods and a 60% (or higher) tariff on goods from China.2 But if Trump’s proposed tariffs were fully implemented, they could lower real U.S. GDP by 0.3% to 0.5% in 2025, according to our calculations.
Sweeping tariffs could also deliver a one-time shock to inflation, but this sharp immediate impact would likely fade over time. More—and faster—permitting and leasing in the oil and gas complex could also provide a disinflationary offset, possibly pushing oil prices down 10% to 15% if supply rises.
We estimate that the net impact of tariffs and lower energy prices could lead to a 1.5% to 2% jump in the Consumer Price Index on a year-on-year basis.3 These reflationary expectations are likely one of the reasons that interest rates rose and the yield curve steepened when betting odds for a Trump presidency increased.
However, it’s worth noting that the final impact of tariffs could be more modest than our estimates suggest. The proposals could be narrowed, and will likely spark legal challenges, as they have previously. Further, the impact could lessen if the tariffs are staggered over time or if custom duties are recycled into targeted industry subsidies that help companies from passing on the costs to consumers.
Our analysis finds that if Trump’s proposals were fully implemented, the impact on major trading peers would be less inflationary than in the United States, but likely more detrimental to growth. Said differently, we expect tariffs to slow growth disproportionately for goods exporters and raise inflation disproportionately for goods importers. For example, we estimate a potential 0.7% hit to Eurozone GDP, roughly twice as large as in the United States, but just a 0.2% (or less) increase in European inflation.4
Such divergence could have implications for the relative monetary policy stance in each region, and thus the EUR-USD exchange rate. In isolation, former President Trump’s tariff policy would likely continue to underpin U.S. dollar strength.5
Whoever wins the November U.S. election, the individual provisions of the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act (TCJA) will expire at the end of 2025.6 If they are not extended, tax rates for most individual taxpayers would rise between 1% and 4%.7 The law’s corporate tax cut, which lowered rates from 35% to 21%, has no sunset provision.
Former President Trump has said that he would like to extend the law in its entirety, and has even proposed lowering the corporate rate further. Vice President Harris has said she would not raise taxes on individuals earning less than $400,000 a year.
If all the TCJA’s provisions are extended, we would expect near-term growth expectations to rise as high as +0.7% of real GDP. Higher growth comes at the cost of an even higher fiscal deficit. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the fiscal deficit would increase by nearly $5 trillion from fiscal years 2025 to 2034 (as a share of GDP, this would be equivalent to a roughly 1.4 percentage point sustained increase in the fiscal deficit).8 Of course, rising deficits would only exacerbate the U.S. government’s already elevated levels of federal debt.
At the moment, neither party looks poised to dramatically reduce the U.S. debt burden. That dynamic, along with the potential for growth upside from even lower tax rates, could put further upward pressure on longer-dated yields and keep bond market volatility high into 2025.
For many years, immigration has been a sensitive political issue in the United States (and many other developed economies). Since 1986, the U.S. Congress has enacted no new immigration laws. As a result, presidents of both parties have used executive orders to address the issue, though nearly all orders have faced legal challenges.
According to recent Gallup Polls, Americans consider immigration to be the biggest issue facing the nation. The issue is now a focus of both Democrats and Republicans. In June, President Biden signed an executive order to shut down the border under certain circumstances and to limit asylum protection. We expect more of the same under Harris.
Trump has proposed mass deportations of undocumented immigrants should he win the 2024 election. It should be noted, though, that while Trump called for deporting 11 million migrants when he was President, deportations averaged only 300,000 per year between 2017 and 2020.
What are the economic implications of changes to immigration policy?
Over the past two years, immigrants have significantly boosted the U.S. labor supply. This has supported economic growth and added to monthly payrolls gains without materially boosting inflation. Directionally, we would expect the reverse to happen were we to see a material drop in immigration. However, it’s important to differentiate between a reduction in the flow of immigrants entering the United States versus a large deportation of the number of existing immigrants in the country.
History suggests the deportation scenario is unlikely. The chart below shows plausible outcomes for immigration after the election, corresponding to an estimated impact on U.S. real GDP ranging from 0% to 0.6%.
J.P. Morgan Investment Bank estimates that the Biden administration’s IRA and CHIPS Act have stimulated close to $500 billion in announced private investments in semiconductor and clean tech manufacturing facilities. This has been a crucial support to business investment outlays in what would otherwise be a capital investment environment challenged by high interest rates. We would expect the status quo to persist under a Harris administration.
Opposition to the green transition by former President Trump could pose a risk to parts of IRA and CHIPS act spending. Republicans could slow IRA-related lending by the Department of Energy and reduce some subsidies, but we’d expect that much of the IRA support would likely continue. The majority of IRA and CHIPS Act spending is occurring in traditionally Republican or swing states. Thus, even if Republicans take control of both the House and Senate, the party may soften its opposition to IRA and CHIPS Act spending to appeal to their constituents. In addition, while Republican policies would likely challenge capital investment in renewables, the party remains supportive of fossil fuel capex.
As we have noted, we currently expect a continuation of the status quo under a Harris administration. Our analysis suggests another Trump administration could be reflationary and a modest headwind to economic growth. However, increased energy supply and lower taxes could work to offset those dynamics.
Your J.P. Morgan team is here to help you better understand the risks and opportunities of the upcoming U.S. election.
1https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/nam/en/insights/markets-and-investing/how-do-geopolitical-shocks-impact-markets
2Source: Donald J. Trump Fox Business Interview as of August 23, 2023.
3To arrive at this result, we utilize the Peterson Institute’s estimate of the tariff cost to middle-income families (equivalent to a tax increase of about $1,700 annually) and the FRB/US large-scale econometric model. See: https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/2024-05/pb24-1.pdf.
4The reason for the muted impact on Eurozone inflation is that European imports from the United States account for a minimal (2% of) GDP share. This is also assuming Europe would retaliate to U.S. tariffs in kind.
5There is a risk that a Trump-controlled U.S. Treasury could take a more activist approach intended to weaken the dollar in global markets. We acknowledge the uncertainty, but we are skeptical of what a unilateral effort to weaken the dollar might look like. Nevertheless, we will be watching for any concrete proposals.
6Source: “A Look Ahead at Expiring Tax Provisions,” Tax Foundation. https://taxfoundation.org/blog/look-ahead-expiring-tax-provisions/. Accessed 12 Dec. 2023.
7Sources: Internal Revenue Service and J.P. Morgan. Data as of December 31, 2019. * Note: https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2023/4/11/long-term-effects-of-permanent-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act.
8Source: Congressional Budget Office, Bureau of Labor Statistics, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data as of July 2024.
We can help you navigate a complex financial landscape. Reach out today to learn how.
Contact usLEARN MORE About Our Firm and Investment Professionals Through FINRA BrokerCheck
To learn more about J.P. Morgan’s investment business, including our accounts, products and services, as well as our relationship with you, please review our J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Form CRS and Guide to Investment Services and Brokerage Products.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates (collectively "JPMCB") offer investment products, which may include bank-managed accounts and custody, as part of its trust and fiduciary services. Other investment products and services, such as brokerage and advisory accounts, are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS"), a member of FINRA and SIPC. Insurance products are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. JPMCB, JPMS and CIA are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.
Please read the Legal Disclaimer for key important J.P. Morgan Private Bank information in conjunction with these pages.
Bank deposit products, such as checking, savings and bank lending and related services are offered by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Member FDIC.
Not a commitment to lend. All extensions of credit are subject to credit approval.