Markets are expensive, so diversification is essential. With guarded optimism, we believe equity markets have room to run higher.
Ms. Rooney:
Hello and welcome. As we prepare to enter 2020, I invite you to join me for a conversation with our Chief Investment Officer, Richard Madigan, on what lies ahead.
So last year was a very strong year in terms of performance, and we saw portfolios ranging from conservative all the way to growth return something between 13 to almost 22 percent for that stock/bond blend. And yet, I think there were a lot of folks who actually pulled money out of equity markets. Almost $250 billion came out. Yet you kept your overweight and you kept it through the whole year. And so the question is, what’s your conviction now in that overweight?
Mr. Madigan:
That’s an easy question to answer: high conviction. We’re active managers. So I show up every day with the team, look at portfolio positions, think about risk, think about whether we want to dial things up or down. We do that so clients don’t have to. We’re still pro-cyclically positioned in portfolios. So at a high level, I’m overweight stocks versus bonds. And within stocks, I’m overweight still the U.S. equity market. And I feel good about that. I think over the last three months, four months, the biggest focus for me has been making sure, given where we are—not only in the cycle but also valuations—that we’re appropriately diversifying risk, and not overreaching or concentrating risk right now in markets.
Ms. Rooney:
Let’s talk about expectations…for a second, because I think there was an element of 2019’s returns… Where global equity markets were up almost 28 percent. That was payback for 2018. But are we also borrowing from future returns? And so if I’m a client and I’m invested, should I lower my expectations?
Mr. Madigan:
Temper expectations if you’re only looking at 2019. And I want anchor on something you said, Nancy. You can’t look at 2019 extraordinary performance without recognizing 2018 and the collapse we saw in risk assets toward the end of that year. Blend the two together, and you’ve got a reasonable approximation of what I think is fair value and reasonable returns.
The pulling-forward dynamic is an interesting question because to me what carried equity markets last year were valuations. It wasn’t earnings. And that’s got to reverse this year. So my expectation is for global earnings, we see five to six percent growth. Maybe some upside around that, and that comes from buyback activity. Tack on two percent for dividends, and as a base case, thinking that we see high single digit returns across global equity markets.
Ms. Rooney:
So in a kind of way a reverse of last year, where multiples stay somewhat similar to where they are now. But it’s earnings that grow. This is an election year. And with every tweet and with every comment… We’re seeing markets move. You also have overweights to some what I would call politically sensitive types of sectors like healthcare is one. And so how do you navigate this type of an environment where there are so many comments that come out that move markets?
Mr. Madigan:
Carefully. I’m a fundamental…investor. So I focus much more on the macro environment, the market environment, what we’re thinking is happening in fiscal monetary policy default risk, and then valuation whether on an absolute or relative basis. Healthcare is an interesting observation because to me those were positions that we held to be a little bit more defensive in the portfolio last year. We actually trimmed them back coming into this year with the expectation that headlines are going to stay noisy. But I want to separate noise from market resistance, and I think there’s a great deal of noise ahead of us. It’s opportunity to me. So that’s a tactical opportunity, again, to step into risk and then to hopefully step back from risk at the right point around it. Politics isn’t going away. The one word of caution I think I’d lend to anyone especially around the U.S. election—we’re very early in this race. We don’t even know who the two candidates are going to be. So paying attention to the political policy rhetoric right now is important. Positioning a portfolio ahead of that and way ahead of November elections I just think is a little presumptuous.
Ms. Rooney:
A lot has been written and talked about in the space of environmental and social responsibility. In fact, we believe it as a firm ourselves. And while you don’t have an ESG strategy per se directly, around the environment, social and governance, it clearly is having an impact in terms of where flows are going.
And so how do you incorporate that as you think about the sectors and where you want to invest?
Mr. Madigan:
For the U.S. market in particular, there’s a structural shift going on that’s gaining momentum. And I can see that not only from investor interest, but also from company interest. When my Equity team is out meeting with companies now, I can tell you in almost every meeting we’re having the theme of sustainable investing, ESG comes up in some form in that conversation, and ironically provoked by companies to a large degree in terms of interest around that. We’re still very early in terms of the definitional state of the toolkit. So as the investment toolkit continues to evolve, I’m trying to discern a couple of things. I think first and fundamentally, as an investor, what does it mean over a longer period with regard to valuations, because you said money is in motion. That may have an impact on credit spreads, in valuations, equity multiples as well. That’s yet to be proven. The one thing I will tell you, it’s a space that I’ve been incredibly excited about and one that I think does greater good in terms of…people’s relative awareness.
Ms. Rooney:
So I would say we have ESG-dedicated strategies for clients who are so motivated. What do you think looks different in 2020, or what are you looking at?
Mr. Madigan:
I think the fact that we have a Phase One trade deal right now brings me back to revisiting emerging markets under the construct, not for valuations because emerging markets are by no means cheap right now, but the earnings dynamic and the how we think earnings will lay out again some of the other international markets. So there’s a little bit more to come on that one. Europe from a top-down perspective to me has still got its challenges with regard to growth. Bottom up is becoming a lot more interesting. So the team is literally looking at sector and subsector exposure. Staples we own and continue to like. We’re doing a bunch of work right now on things as broad as mid-cap exposure to financials, to technology and healthcare. I think you’ll make money in Europe bottom up by sector allocations this year—not blindly allocating top down.
Ms. Rooney:
So if I were to put it all together, you remain overweight equities, funded from bonds, continue to see earnings—in fact the market should grow into their earnings—and bonds, while they don’t offer a terrific from a yield perspective. Not much of a buffer. Still important from a portfolio construction and insurance perspective.
Mr. Madigan:
They are there for portfolio insurance.
Ms. Rooney:
Right. And so that diversification, as I’ve heard you say before, arguably as almost more important when you see things fully valued. But it’s also they’re fully valued, but fairly valued.
Mr. Madigan:
I would say that across markets right now. And that again goes back to the diversification argument. We will inevitably see a bump or two ahead. I don’t want to—or I hesitate in saying I’m looking forward to that. But it’s something we’re ready to take advantage of.
Ms. Rooney:
Thank you, Richard.
Mr. Madigan:
Pleasure.
END
Side note:
Legal disclosures appear.
Text on screen:
INVESTMENT AND INSURANCE PRODUCTS ARE:
• NOT FDIC INSURED
• NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY
• NOT A DEPOSIT OR OTHER OBLIGATION OF, OR GUARANTEED BY, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES
• SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LOSS OF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INVESTED.
Please read important information at the end.
On screen:
A blonde woman with a light suit and stylish scarf, Nancy Rooney, sits in a comfortable office and speaks to the viewer.
Ms. Rooney:
Hello and welcome. As we prepare to enter 2020, I invite you to join me for a conversation with our Chief Investment Officer, Richard Madigan, on what lies ahead.
Logo:
J.P.Morgan.
Text on screen:
February 2020. Market Thoughts: Guarded Optimism.
On screen:
Nancy sits in the office across from a man with salt-and-pepper hair in a business suit, with his top button casually undone, Richard Madigan. She gestures slightly with her hands as she begins the conversation.
Text on screen:
Nancy Rooney, Global Head of Managed Solutions. J.P. Morgan Private Bank.
Ms. Rooney:
So last year was a very strong year in terms of performance, and we saw portfolios ranging from conservative all the way to growth return something between 13 to almost 22 percent for that stock/bond blend. And yet, I think there were a lot of folks who actually pulled money out of equity markets. Almost $250 billion came out. Yet you kept your overweight and you kept it through the whole year. And so the question is, what’s your conviction now in that overweight?
Text on screen:
Richard Madigan, Chief Investment Officer, J.P. Morgan Private Bank.
Mr. Madigan:
That’s an easy question to answer: high conviction. We’re active managers. So I show up every day with the team, look at portfolio positions, think about risk, think about whether we want to dial things up or down. We do that so clients don’t have to. We’re still pro-cyclically positioned in portfolios. So at a high level, I’m overweight stocks versus bonds. And within stocks, I’m overweight still the U.S. equity market. And I feel good about that. I think over the last three months, four months, the biggest focus for me has been making sure, given where we are—not only in the cycle but also valuations—that we’re appropriately diversifying risk, and not overreaching or concentrating risk right now in markets.
Ms. Rooney:
Let’s talk about expectations…for a second, because I think there was an element of 2019’s returns… Where global equity markets were up almost 28 percent. That was payback for 2018. But are we also borrowing from future returns? And so if I’m a client and I’m invested, should I lower my expectations?
Mr. Madigan:
Temper expectations if you’re only looking at 2019. And I want anchor on something you said, Nancy. You can’t look at 2019 extraordinary performance without recognizing 2018 and the collapse we saw in risk assets toward the end of that year. Blend the two together, and you’ve got a reasonable approximation of what I think is fair value and reasonable returns.
On screen:
A bar chart appears titled "Risk assets bounced back last year." It shows 2018 Total Returns with: DM equities at about -8%, EM equities at about -15%, US High Yield Bonds at about -3%, and Global Bonds at about 2%. It shows 2019 Total Returns with: DM equities at about 27%, EM equities at about 18%, US High Yield Bonds at about15%, and Global Bonds at about 10%.
Side note:
Small print text.
Text on screen:
Source: Bloomberg. Data as of December 2019. DM equities = MSCI World Index, Global bonds = Bloomberg-Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index, EM equities = MSCI Emerging Markets Index,
and US high yield bonds = JPMorgan Domestic High Yield Index. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
Mr. Madigan:
The pulling-forward dynamic is an interesting question because to me what carried equity markets last year were valuations. It wasn’t earnings. And that’s got to reverse this year. So my expectation is for global earnings, we see five to six percent growth. Maybe some upside around that, and that comes from buyback activity. Tack on two percent for dividends, and as a base case, thinking that we see high single digit returns across global equity markets.
Text on screen:
2020 Global Equity Return Expectations*: Global Earnings – 5-6%. Dividends and Buyback Activity – 2-4%. High Single Digits. *: Base case.
Ms. Rooney:
So in a kind of way a reverse of last year, where multiples stay somewhat similar to where they are now. But it’s earnings that grow. This is an election year. And with every tweet and with every comment… We’re seeing markets move. You also have overweights to some what I would call politically sensitive types of sectors like healthcare is one. And so how do you navigate this type of an environment where there are so many comments that come out that move markets?
Mr. Madigan:
Carefully. I’m a fundamental…investor. So I focus much more on the macro environment, the market environment, what we’re thinking is happening in fiscal monetary policy default risk, and then valuation whether on an absolute or relative basis. Healthcare is an interesting observation because to me those were positions that we held to be a little bit more defensive in the portfolio last year. We actually trimmed them back coming into this year with the expectation that headlines are going to stay noisy. But I want to separate noise from market resistance, and I think there’s a great deal of noise ahead of us. It’s opportunity to me. So that’s a tactical opportunity, again, to step into risk and then to hopefully step back from risk at the right point around it. Politics isn’t going away. The one word of caution I think I’d lend to anyone especially around the U.S. election—we’re very early in this race. We don’t even know who the two candidates are going to be. So paying attention to the political policy rhetoric right now is important. Positioning a portfolio ahead of that and way ahead of November elections I just think is a little presumptuous.
Ms. Rooney:
A lot has been written and talked about in the space of environmental and social responsibility. In fact, we believe it as a firm ourselves. And while you don’t have an ESG strategy per se directly, around the environment, social and governance, it clearly is having an impact in terms of where flows are going.
Text on screen:
Environmental:
· Renewable energy
· Clean water
Social:
· Community revitalization
· Data security
Governance:
· Gender diversity
· Board composition
Ms. Rooney:
And so how do you incorporate that as you think about the sectors and where you want to invest?
Mr. Madigan:
For the U.S. market in particular, there’s a structural shift going on that’s gaining momentum. And I can see that not only from investor interest, but also from company interest. When my Equity team is out meeting with companies now, I can tell you in almost every meeting we’re having the theme of sustainable investing, ESG comes up in some form in that conversation, and ironically provoked by companies to a large degree in terms of interest around that. We’re still very early in terms of the definitional state of the toolkit. So as the investment toolkit continues to evolve, I’m trying to discern a couple of things. I think first and fundamentally, as an investor, what does it mean over a longer period with regard to valuations, because you said money is in motion. That may have an impact on credit spreads, in valuations, equity multiples as well. That’s yet to be proven. The one thing I will tell you, it’s a space that I’ve been incredibly excited about and one that I think does greater good in terms of…people’s relative awareness.
Ms. Rooney:
So I would say we have ESG-dedicated strategies for clients who are so motivated. What do you think looks different in 2020, or what are you looking at?
Mr. Madigan:
I think the fact that we have a Phase One trade deal right now brings me back to revisiting emerging markets under the construct, not for valuations because emerging markets are by no means cheap right now, but the earnings dynamic and the how we think earnings will lay out again some of the other international markets. So there’s a little bit more to come on that one. Europe from a top-down perspective to me has still got its challenges with regard to growth. Bottom up is becoming a lot more interesting. So the team is literally looking at sector and subsector exposure. Staples we own and continue to like. We’re doing a bunch of work right now on things as broad as mid-cap exposure to financials, to technology and healthcare. I think you’ll make money in Europe bottom up by sector allocations this year—not blindly allocating top down.
Ms. Rooney:
So if I were to put it all together, you remain overweight equities, funded from bonds, continue to see earnings—in fact the market should grow into their earnings—and bonds, while they don’t offer a terrific from a yield perspective. Not much of a buffer. Still important from a portfolio construction and insurance perspective.
Mr. Madigan:
They are there for portfolio insurance.
Ms. Rooney:
Right. And so that diversification, as I’ve heard you say before, arguably as almost more important when you see things fully valued. But it’s also they’re fully valued, but fairly valued.
Mr. Madigan:
I would say that across markets right now. And that again goes back to the diversification argument. We will inevitably see a bump or two ahead. I don’t want to—or I hesitate in saying I’m looking forward to that. But it’s something we’re ready to take advantage of.
Ms. Rooney:
Thank you, Richard.
Mr. Madigan:
Pleasure.
Text on screen:
February 2020. Market Thoughts: Guarded Optimism.
Logo:
J.P.Morgan.
Side note:
Legal disclosures appear.
Text on screen:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Key Risks
This material is for information purposes only, and may inform you of certain products and services offered by J.P. Morgan’s wealth management businesses, part of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPM”). Please read all Important Information.
General Risks & Considerations
Any views, strategies or products discussed in this material may not be appropriate for all individuals and are subject to risks. Investors may get back less than they invested, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Asset allocation/diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss. Nothing in this material should be relied upon in isolation for the purpose of making an investment decision. You are urged to consider carefully whether the services, products, asset classes (e.g., equities, fixed income, alternative investments, commodities, etc.) or strategies discussed are suitable to your needs. You must also consider the objectives, risks, charges, and expenses associated with an investment service, product or strategy prior to making an investment decision. For this and more complete information, including discussion of your goals/situation, contact your J.P. Morgan representative.
Non-Reliance
Certain information contained in this material is believed to be reliable; however, JPM does not represent or warrant its accuracy, reliability or completeness, or accept any liability for any loss or damage (whether direct or indirect) arising out of the use of all or any part of this material. No representation or warranty should be made with regard to any computations, graphs, tables, diagrams or commentary in this material, which are provided for illustration/reference purposes only. The views, opinions, estimates and strategies expressed in this material constitute our judgment based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. JPM assumes no duty to update any information in this material in the event that such information changes. Views, opinions, estimates and strategies expressed herein may differ from those expressed by other areas of JPM, views expressed for other purposes or in other contexts, and this material should not be regarded as a research report. Any projected results and risks are based solely on hypothetical examples cited, and actual results and risks will vary depending on specific circumstances. Forward-looking statements should not be considered as guarantees or predictions of future events.
Nothing in this document shall be construed as giving rise to any duty of care owed to, or advisory relationship with, you or any third party. Nothing in this document shall be regarded as an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice (whether financial, accounting, legal, tax or other) given by J.P. Morgan and/or its officers or employees, irrespective of whether or not such communication was given at your request. J.P. Morgan and its affiliates and employees do not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any financial transactions.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR INVESTMENTS AND POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Conflicts of interest will arise whenever JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or any of its affiliates (together, “J.P. Morgan”) have an actual or perceived economic or other incentive in its management of our clients’ portfolios to act in a way that benefits J.P. Morgan. Conflicts will result, for example (to the extent the following activities are permitted in your account): (1) when J.P. Morgan invests in an investment product, such as a mutual fund, structured product, separately managed account or hedge fund issued or managed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or an affiliate, such as J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.; (2) when a J.P. Morgan entity obtains services, including trade execution and trade clearing, from an affiliate; (3) when J.P. Morgan receives payment as a result of purchasing an investment product for a client’s account; or (4) when J.P. Morgan receives payment for providing services (including shareholder servicing, recordkeeping or custody) with respect to investment products purchased for a client’s portfolio. Other conflicts will result because of relationships that J.P. Morgan has with other clients or when J.P. Morgan acts for its own account.
Investment strategies are selected from both J.P. Morgan and third-party asset managers and are subject to a review process by our manager research teams. From this pool of strategies, our portfolio construction teams select those strategies we believe fit our asset allocation goals and forward-looking views in order to meet the portfolio’s investment objective.
As a general matter, we prefer J.P. Morgan managed strategies. We expect the proportion of J.P. Morgan managed strategies will be high (in fact, up to 100 percent) in strategies such as, for example, cash and high-quality fixed income, subject to applicable law and any account-specific considerations.
While our internally managed strategies generally align well with our forward-looking views, and we are familiar with the investment processes as well as the risk and compliance philosophy of the firm, it is important to note that J.P. Morgan receives more overall fees when internally managed strategies are included. We offer the option of choosing to exclude J.P. Morgan managed strategies (other than cash and liquidity products) in certain portfolios.
The Six Circles Funds are U.S.-registered mutual funds managed by J.P. Morgan and sub-advised by third parties. Although considered internally managed strategies, JPMC does not retain a fee for fund management or other fund services.
Legal Entity, Brand & Regulatory Information
In the United States, bank deposit accounts and related services, such as checking, savings and bank lending, are offered by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Member FDIC.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates (collectively “JPMCB”) offer investment products, which may include bank-managed investment accounts and custody, as part of its trust and fiduciary services. Other investment products and services, such as brokerage and advisory accounts, are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“JPMS”), a member of FINRA and SIPC. JPMCB and JPMS are affiliated companies under the common control of JPM. Products not available in all states.
In Luxembourg, this material is issued by J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. (JPMBL), with registered office at European Bank and Business Centre, 6 route de Treves, L-2633, Senningerberg, Luxembourg. R.C.S Luxembourg B10.958. Authorized and regulated by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) and jointly supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB) and the CSSF. J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. is authorized as a credit institution in accordance with the Law of 5th April 1993. In the United Kingdom, this material is issued by J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., London Branch. Prior to Brexit (Brexit meaning that the United Kingdom leaves the European Union under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, or, if later, loses its ability to passport financial services between the United Kingdom and the remainder of the EEA), J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., London Branch is subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. In the event of Brexit, in the United Kingdom, J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., London Branch is authorized by the Prudential Regulation Authority, subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. In Spain, this material is distributed by J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Sucursal en España, with registered office at Paseo de la Castellana, 31, 28046 Madrid, Spain. J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Sucursal en España is registered under number 1516 within the administrative registry of the Bank of Spain and supervised by the Spanish Securities Market Commission (CNMV). In Germany, this material is distributed by J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Frankfurt Branch, registered office at Taunustor 1 (TaunusTurm), 60310 Frankfurt, Germany, jointly supervised by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) and the European Central Bank (ECB), and in certain areas also supervised by the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin). In Italy, this material is distributed by J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Milan Branch, registered office at Via Catena Adalberto 4, Milan 20121, Italy and regulated by Bank of Italy and the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB). In the Netherlands, this material is distributed by J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Amsterdam Branch, with registered office at World Trade Centre, Tower B, Strawinskylaan 1135, 1077 XX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Amsterdam Branch is authorized and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) and jointly supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB) and the CSSF in Luxembourg; J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Amsterdam Branch is also authorized and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) in the Netherlands. Registered with the Kamer van Koophandel as a branch of J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. under registration number 71651845. In Denmark, this material is distributed by J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg, Copenhagen Br, filial af J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. with registered office at Kalvebod Brygge 39-41, 1560 København V, Denmark. J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg, Copenhagen Br, filial af J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. is authorized and regulated by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) and jointly supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB) and the CSSF. J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg, Copenhagen Br, filial af J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. is also subject to the supervision of Finanstilsynet (Danish FSA) and registered with Finanstilsynet as a branch of J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. under code 29009. In Sweden, this material is distributed by J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Stockholm Bankfilial, with registered office at Hamngatan 15, Stockholm, 11147, Sweden. J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Stockholm Bankfilial is authorized and regulated by Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) and jointly supervised by the European Central Bank (ECB) and the CSSF. J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A., Stockholm Bankfilial is also subject to the supervision of Finansinspektionen (Swedish FSA). Registered with Finansinspektionen as a branch of J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A. In France, this material is distributed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMCB”), Paris branch, which is regulated by the French banking authorities Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and Autorité des Marchés Financiers. In Switzerland, this material is distributed by J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA, which is regulated in Switzerland by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).
In Hong Kong, this material is distributed by JPMCB, Hong Kong branch. JPMCB, Hong Kong branch is regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, we will cease to use your personal data for our marketing purposes without charge if you so request. In Singapore, this material is distributed by JPMCB, Singapore branch. JPMCB, Singapore branch is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Dealing and advisory services and discretionary investment management services are provided to you by JPMCB, Hong Kong/Singapore branch (as notified to you). Banking and custody services are provided to you by JPMCB Singapore Branch. The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in Hong Kong, Singapore or any other jurisdictions. You are advised to exercise caution in relation to this document. If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this document, you should obtain independent professional advice. For materials which constitute product advertisement under the Securities and Futures Act and the Financial Advisers Act, this advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is a national banking association chartered under the laws of the United States, and as a body corporate, its shareholder’s liability is limited.
With respect to countries in Latin America, the distribution of this material may be restricted in certain jurisdictions. We may offer and/or sell to you securities or other financial instruments which may not be registered under, and are not the subject of a public offering under, the securities or other financial regulatory laws of your home country. Such securities or instruments are offered and/or sold to you on a private basis only. Any communication by us to you regarding such securities or instruments, including without limitation the delivery of a prospectus, term sheet or other offering document, is not intended by us as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or instruments in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or a solicitation is unlawful. Furthermore, such securities or instruments may be subject to certain regulatory and/or contractual restrictions on subsequent transfer by you, and you are solely responsible for ascertaining and complying with such restrictions. To the extent this content makes reference to a fund, the Fund may not be publicly offered in any Latin American country, without previous registration of such fund’s securities in compliance with the laws of the corresponding jurisdiction. Public offering of any security, including the shares of the Fund, without previous registration at Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission—CVM is completely prohibited. Some products or services contained in the materials might not be currently provided by the Brazilian and Mexican platforms.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMCBNA) (ABN 43 074 112 011/AFS Licence No: 238367) is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Material provided by JPMCBNA in Australia is to “wholesale clients” only. For the purposes of this paragraph the term “wholesale client” has the meaning given in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Please inform us if you are not a Wholesale Client now or if you cease to be a Wholesale Client at any time in the future.
JPMS is a registered foreign company (overseas) (ARBN 109293610) incorporated in Delaware, U.S.A. Under Australian financial services licensing requirements, carrying on a financial services business in Australia requires a financial service provider, such as J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL), unless an exemption applies. JPMS is exempt from the requirement to hold an AFSL under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) in respect of financial services it provides to you, and is regulated by the SEC, FINRA and CFTC under U.S. laws, which differ from Australian laws. Material provided by JPMS in Australia is to “wholesale clients” only. The information provided in this material is not intended to be, and must not be, distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other class of persons in Australia. For the purposes of this paragraph the term “wholesale client” has the meaning given in section 761G of the Act. Please inform us immediately if you are not a Wholesale Client now or if you cease to be a Wholesale Client at any time in the future.
This material has not been prepared specifically for Australian investors. It:
• May contain references to dollar amounts which are not Australian dollars;
• May contain financial information which is not prepared in accordance with Australian law or practices;
• May not address risks associated with investment in foreign currency denominated investments; and
• Does not address Australian tax issues.
References to “J.P. Morgan” are to JPM, its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. “J.P. Morgan Private Bank” is the brand name for the private banking business conducted by JPM. This material is intended for your personal use and should not be circulated to or used by any other person, or duplicated for non-personal use, without our permission. If you have any questions or no longer wish to receive these communications, please contact your J.P. Morgan representative.
Copyright 2020 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.
END
IN BRIEF:
Market Outlook
- Think back to last year’s common call for recession. Our no-recession view stood out, grounded in fundamentals. That guarded optimism prevails.
- I believe stocks can outperform bonds ahead, but at a more reasonable pace than 2019. We’re going to see market bumps along the way.
- Global growth should remain right around trend, with inflation benign. There is downside risk to our view until the economic effects of the coronavirus outbreak become better understood.
- With greater clarity about central bank policy being on hold—or easing—investors face less uncertainty about where rates are heading. That helps support current valuation levels.
Portfolios
- Nothing stands out as cheap across markets. We are active managers focused on making sure portfolios are well diversified. This isn’t a point in the cycle to be overreaching for risk.
- With government bond yields low, credit spreads tight, corporate default rates contained and central banks on hold, equity multiples look full and fairly valued.
- We maintain an overweight to stocks versus bonds, and we’re overweight U.S. equities relative to international markets.
- Our advice to stay invested last year may have been hard to listen to. That advice still holds.
Think back to last year’s common call for recession. Our no-recession view stood out, grounded in fundamentals. Fearmongering isn’t investment advice, it’s grandstanding, and there was quite a bit of it going on throughout 2019.
Having missed last year’s rally, many of those same bearish pundits are now bullish. I don’t believe the macro environment was as bad as it was made out to be last year. However, markets aren’t poised for a one-way melt-up this year. Our more balanced outlook is reflected in current portfolio positioning. I believe stocks will outperform bonds ahead, but by a more reasonable margin. We’ll certainly have market bumps to get through along the way.
Global developed equity markets returned 28% last year. Core bonds returned between 6.0% and 8.5%, depending on the market. Looking back is easy. For most of last year, few felt constructive about the macro economy, market cycle or investment outlook. We held our ground and pro-cyclical portfolio positioning. I’m sure our advice to stay invested was hard to listen to at points during the year. That advice still holds.
Rational exuberance
Market returns were strong in 2019. However, you can’t look at 2019 returns without factoring in the significant sell-off we saw across equity markets in late 2018. A large part of last year’s returns was simply the result of risk assets bouncing back from an outsized sell-off (Figure 1). Last year’s “exuberance” was a rational response to an emotional 2018 correction.
Figure 1. Risk assets bounced back last year
The bar graph shows total return of developed market equities, emerging
market equities, U.S. high yield bonds and global bonds in 2018 and 2019.
2019 numbers were resoundly positive while 2018 numbers were negative
except for global bonds.
Data from EPFR Global showed $245 billion in outflows across global equity market funds last year. Global bond funds saw almost $670 billion in inflows. In addition, over $610 billion went into money market funds. That’s a lot of sidelined cash to be begrudgingly reinvested. To put the 2019 cash inflow in context, in 2018, money market funds saw just under $150 billion of inflows. Many investors moved to cash after the December 2018 sell-off. They should have been doing the opposite.
I mentioned that our no-recession call last year was contrarian. No-recession this year is a consensus view, for the right reasons. With a great deal more clarity around central banks being on hold—or easing—investors face less uncertainty about where policy rates are heading. The IMF calculates that in 2019, there were 71 policy rate cuts across 49 central banks globally. That’s the most synchronous central bank easing we’ve seen since the 2008 financial crisis.
With central banks biased to cut policy rates as needed, a bigger challenge rests on how much more central bank easing can actually accomplish. Today, developed market central banks are effectively “pushing on a string” with regard to their ability to further stimulate growth. Their willingness to ease will continue to help support valuations across risk assets, but the reality is, if things get worse, investors will turn to governments for fiscal easing. That’s a harder policy nut to crack.
A large part of the confidence markets continue to take from central banks being on hold—and biased to ease—comes from a backdrop of benign inflation. Average hourly earnings in the United States are right around 3%. That’s a “goldilocks” level for markets (Figure 2). It’s not too hot to weigh significantly on corporate margins or press inflation expectations markedly higher. It’s also not too cold to stymie consumption. Valuations across risk assets look fundamentally deserved and supported. However, that doesn’t mean equity markets are cheap.
Figure 2. Solid U.S. labor market and contained wage growth
The line chart shows from 2009 to January 2020 average hourly earnings on the left-hand side at about 3%, and the unemployment rate, inverted, on the right-hand side. The unemployment rate is currently at one of the lowest levels we’ve seen over this time period.
Better background music
The U.S. administration has locked down a “Phase-One” trade deal with China. NAFTA 2.0 (the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA) has been approved, as has a mini trade deal between the United States and Japan. Each is giving investors greater confidence that trade spats may be sidelined into the U.S. November elections. However, that won’t preclude negative trade-related headlines.
With more constructive investor sentiment swirling about markets, has anything really changed? The background music is better. There is a lot to be said for less uncertainty, and investors have responded accordingly. I’ve heard the word “complacency” bandied about several times as it relates to animal spirits. I don’t believe we’re there yet. Investors may be increasing their enthusiasm, but so far, market interest is grounded in an improving macro and market backdrop.
I expect global growth to be in line with where we were in 2019 (Figure 3). That said, the outbreak of the coronavirus in China has increased uncertainty. It’s too early to know the drag the virus may place on growth ahead. Right now, we expect a first-half global growth slowdown that can recover in the second half of this year.
Our base case is for global growth to be right around trend, somewhere between 3.0% and 3.5%. The United States is likely to grow by about 2%. Europe and Japan will be fortunate to grow by 1%. Emerging markets can grow 4.0%–4.5% this year. Each of these ranges has downside risk—in particular across emerging markets—until the economic effects of the coronavirus outbreak become better understood.
Figure 3. Global growth should remain around trend
The line chart shows growth in emerging markets, developed markets, and the world from 2000 to 2019. Data points currently seem to be near historical averages, with global growth between 3% and 3.5%.
There is little current pressure for inflation expectations to move decidedly higher this year. In the United States, inflation should sit right around 2.0%–2.5%. In Europe and Japan, inflation will continue to be well below central bank targets of 2%. For investors, that is welcomed background music.
So far, so good
We are in the 11th year of the U.S. expansion. We’ve seen several mini-cycle slowdowns throughout this decade-plus expansion. Each slowdown has seen manufacturing production trend lower without pulling the broader economy down with it (Figure 4). Manufacturing simply doesn’t have the outsized impact it had historically on many developed economies. That’s why consumer confidence and consumption are so important to keep the current cycle intact. So far, so good.
Figure 4. U.S. GDP growth has been resilient to manufacturing slowdowns
The line chart shows developed market industrial production excluding construction and developed market GDP growth from 2010 through late 2019. Despite a slowdown in industrial production, GDP growth has remained fairly stable.
I don’t see the move lower in longer-dated government bond yields as a concern. It feels like investors have come to terms with the Fed being firmly on hold, having cut policy rates by 75 basis points. There has also been a flight to longer-dated government bonds because of rising concern about the coronavirus. We’ve seen a similar flight to safety into the U.S. dollar.
With regard to bonds, investors hope central banks will ease should we see greater pressure on first-half growth because of the virus. It’s being viewed as both a demand and supply shock that central banks can help ameliorate—whether by cutting policy rates and/or increasing bond purchases. We’ll see.
Chair Powell has clearly signaled the Fed remains on hold. The summary of economic projections was revised to show no expected change in policy rates this year, with one possible hike in 2021 and 2022. The Fed has said it needs to see “significant and persistent inflation” before it will raise rates. Europe and Japan are in a weaker position relative to the United States when it comes to inflation. That leaves both the ECB and Bank of Japan with a bias for additional easing.
I am watching closely to see if inflation expectations begin to point higher. If we’re surprised by stronger economic growth, higher inflation should be supportive of risk assets, though may weigh on valuations. For every pundit that says inflation is the greatest risk to current markets, they’re right. But the probability of that being the risk that derails markets this year, I believe, remains low. We need to see where the growth environment takes us.
Guarded optimism
My guarded optimism prevails. I believe markets are fairly valued. Risk assets are expensive and reflect where we are in the macro and market cycles. Developed and emerging markets are expensive relative to their own histories. As an active manager, nothing stands out as cheap across markets. It’s why we’re focused on making sure portfolios are well diversified. When markets are expensive and pressing higher, diversification is essential.
I believe equity markets have room to run higher. While multiples are expensive, they need current market context. With government bond yields low, credit spreads tight, corporate default rates contained and central banks on hold, stocks look full and fairly valued. Looking just at equity risk premia, all else equal, equity markets are far from exuberant (Figure 5). All else is never equal.
Figure 5. Estimated equity risk premiums are elevated
Line chart shows MSCI World and MSCI Emerging Markets forward earnings yields minus 10-year U.S. inflation-linked Treasury bond yields from 1997 to 2020, with current levels elevated.
The validation investors will demand for the confidence to push equity markets higher needs to come from earnings growth. If last year was all about multiples re-rating, this year is about earnings. I do not believe markets can press significantly higher without that validation. It’s going to take us getting through a few quarters of corporate earnings for a proof statement. Investor sentiment has shifted from concern to a “trust but verify” grounding. That is an important positive swing in sentiment.
As a base case, I continue to use 5%–7% earnings growth for the S&P 500 this year. I expect we can see +4%–6% earnings growth across developed equity markets outside the United States and high single-digit earnings growth for emerging markets. Add to those figures +2% in dividends and +1%–2% in buybacks. That gets me to a base case of high single-digit global equity market returns. In comparison, I’m expecting low single-digit returns across fixed income. That’s why we’re overweight stocks versus bonds.
Over the past few months, we’ve seen a rotation into—and bootstrapping up of—several equity sectors and regions that have lagged. That’s a healthy signal for equity markets. Laggards are playing a bit of catch-up. That catch-up trade allows the broader market to rebase, setting a new floor to try to press higher. We are better buyers into a correction. So is everyone else. I mean that as a positive remark. We haven’t reached valuation levels where I think it is time to trim back risk positions.
Seeing is believing
We are fundamental investors. I care about where we are in the market and macro cycles, what’s happening with monetary and fiscal policy, corporate default risk, leverage and how all of that translates into absolute and relative valuations across equity and fixed income markets. There is never an “all clear” bell that’s rung at a market bottom or one that’s rung to signal a market top.
One of my favorite headlines last year was: “Obama will kill the stock market. No, Trump will. No, Warren will.” I say that to anchor on a point I’ve made before. As an investor, I care about politics when it starts to influence fundamentals. I’m following closely policy issues as they are being surfaced in U.S. campaigning. We don’t have enough information to let this year’s November election pretend to influence portfolio positioning. As the facts change, portfolios may change as well.
As I’ve said before, we are active managers, and where we are in a market cycle guides the amount of risk we take in a portfolio. Today isn’t a point in the cycle to be overreaching for risk. Markets will inevitably create an opportunity to be more concentrated in risk taking. Valuations will help frame that decision. Markets are inefficient in the short term because they’re guided by investor emotion and, at times, overreaction.
There is warranted concern about the coronavirus. With rising uncertainty, investors are more cautious. As pundits pivot to revisit the negligible impact SARS had on markets in 2003, it isn’t obvious to me that’s the right proxy. China represented a little less than 5% of the global economy in 2003. Today, China’s economy represents in excess of 15% of global GDP. Its domestic economy continues to pivot toward services and consumption, away from being largely export driven.
Chinese domestic consumption matters a great deal more today to the global economy than it did in 2003. Unlike a natural disaster, which takes time to rebuild and recover from, once we see the coronavirus stabilize, stalled demand can quickly return. To a large degree, that’s why markets have remained resilient.
Hindsight is 20/20
We got a lot of things right last year in portfolios, and it’s important to note that we reunderwrite portfolio positioning on a daily basis. We added to U.S. equities in late December of 2018 and early January of last year. We held onto extended credit in the first quarter as risk assets rallied. We cut allocations when we felt credit spreads were fully valued. I would do that trade again. I prefer to keep that part of a multi-asset portfolio risk budget in our equity overweight.
We held onto our U.S. equity overweight and added to it last year. Today, we are as much as 5% overweight the U.S. equity market across portfolios. We avoided emerging equity markets last year, which underperformed developed markets by around -9%.
With trade détente in the air, we are revisiting emerging equity markets. We first need to better understand the implications with regard to economic and earnings growth in relation to the coronavirus. There is no reason to be early to this trade. If we add, it will be based on expectations for strong relative earnings growth, not because of valuations. Emerging markets aren’t cheap.
We are at a full duration weight in our fixed income allocations for multi-asset portfolios. We’ve been steady buyers of bonds when yields have backed up. As the cycle extends, we may be again. Across our fixed income allocations, I’m focused on owning high-quality liquid bonds.
In a multi-asset portfolio, we hold core bonds as portfolio insurance. Yield alone isn’t a driver for owning government bonds. I expect that to be the case for most of this year. Given our outlook for range-bound government bond markets, we continue to own fixed income to help diversify risk across portfolios.
What are the things we got wrong last year that stand out? I underestimated the drag we continue to see on Japanese equity markets. Japan remains inexpensive relative to U.S. and broader developed market equities. While we were underweight Japan last year, we should have cut positions further.
We sold out of investment-grade credit too soon. While I would not step back in to add at current levels, we should have held onto those positions a little longer. We were also too defensive in pockets of our equity sector positioning. Those positions were there to allow us to maintain our equity overweight and add to our U.S. regional overweight. Energy and healthcare stand out as underperformers.
Finally, for portfolios that own alternatives, both hedge funds and liquid alternatives were strong performers. While we held full allocations to hedge funds, we were underweight liquid alternatives. Alternatives continue to be an important complement to our fixed income positioning.
The world lost one of its great central bankers last year, Paul Volcker. I highly recommend his 2018 memoir Keeping At It. It’s a quick read and wonderful synopsis of an incredible man and his life. It’s easy to forget—with time—how principal a figure Volcker was through some of the most important market, policy and geopolitical challenges of the past decades. As a teaser, it starts with a parrot joke.
Hindsight is 20/20. Live life looking forward; learn from life—like investing—looking back.
