One year later: Bank failures and lessons learned

The world feels a lot different than it did a year ago.

Last week back in March 2023, the near-simultaneous collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and Silvergate Bank shook confidence in the banking system. Many feared a recession was inevitable. Some predicted a stock market crash akin to the Global Financial Crisis.

Yet, the policy response was swift and meaningful. In a short-time, recession obsession faded as the economy proved resilient, and stocks marched onto new all-time highs.

But that doesn’t mean the landscape is without scars: More than three-fourths of U.S. regional banks’ share prices are lower than before the stress began. And while investors no longer fear bank runs, encumbered commercial real estate (CRE) remains a concern. Bank profitability is still under pressure amid high rates, emergency-era lending is coming to a close, and regulation is just getting started.

This week’s Top Market Takeaways unpacks what’s changed over the last year, what’s stayed the same, and what could be ahead. Through risks and market swings, we remain constructive on the path ahead.

What’s changed: There’s been a lot of good

• The economy has powered on. When things felt especially bad, Street expectations for a recession surged as high as 75%. While we were also concerned, we didn’t think the episode would be a repeat of the GFC: policymakers had the tools needed to navigate stress, the banking system as a whole looked sound, the economy was coming from a place of strength, and the magnitude and potential for contagion seemed smaller. That proved true. From there, consumers showed resilience, fiscal stimulus provided powerful support, and an influx of new workers helped swiftly rebalance the labor market. Today, consensus recession probabilities are back down to about 30%, and economists have been revising their U.S. growth estimates even higher. 
• Inflation progress has been real (albeit bumpy), and cuts coming for good reason. As recession fears raged, markets quickly priced out all Fed hikes and even saw three cuts in 2023 to stem the foreseen bleeding – despite core inflation still running at a near 6% annual clip. Yet, strength took root, and the Fed actually hiked a further three times. 
  
  Now, cuts seem in the cards in 2024 – but for very different reasons: last week’s CPI print for February showed that core inflation is at a less-hot 3.8% year-over-year, the coolest it’s been in almost three years. That said, we’d be remiss not to acknowledge that this CPI print, and the one on producer prices last week (PPI), were both hotter-than-expected and too heady for the Fed’s liking. That’s caused some nervousness on how disinflation progresses from here: 10-year Treasury yields have moved almost +20bps higher on the week. We agree that the strength of the economy and the stickiness of inflation have made rate cuts less urgent than they seemed at the start of the year, but we consider the recent data more of a speed bump than a roadblock. Considering tailwinds across the labor market, shelter, supply chains, we continue to see inflation progress as on track towards the Fed’s 2% target over the next year.

• Stocks are making all-time highs, but not everyone is joining in. In the end, last year’s bank stress only prompted the S&P 500 to sell off -8%, and the full year still finished a staggering +26% higher. So far this year, the S&P 500 has made 17 new all-time highs, and it’s not just big tech: the equal-weight index likewise notched its first record in two years last week. Yet, areas of the market that are more in the bank-stress-crosshairs are still showing weakness. Regional banks remain an outlier, and even that is skewed by the most at-risk lenders. Those with more CRE exposure have fared the worst, while some of those with less exposure have actually posted gains over the last year.

What’s stayed the same: There are still risks

• Regional banks aren’t out of the woods. Some of the sorest spots had ultra-concentrated customer bases, particularly in once high-flying parts of the market that burned through cash and relied on easy money, like crypto, venture capital, and start-ups. Moreover, with interest rates higher, all banks have been under pressure to up the ante on deposits (i.e., pay more) to keep savers in the door—if they can’t hack it, they risk their customers yanking their business and going elsewhere. We learned the hard lesson of how that and the worst-case-scenario of deposit flight can put pressure on banks’ balance sheets, especially regionals that aren’t as well-capitalized or diversified: loans made when rates were low quickly became less valuable as the Fed hiked, and thus couldn’t be sold as easily when times turned hard. 
  
  Today, a number of regional banks still look undercapitalized when we account for unrealized losses on their balance sheets. Tension may remain until rates start to fall meaningfully (increasing the value of existing loans) and they rebuild their capital buffers. We don’t see an imminent catalyst bringing about the collapse of another bank, but profitability pressure may remain for some time yet.
• Commercial real estate is a source of vulnerability. Compared to big banks, small banks hold 4.4 times more exposure to U.S. CRE loans than their larger peers. Within that cohort of small banks, CRE loans make up almost 30% of their assets, compared with only 6.5% at big banks. So far, we’ve only seen a minimal pick-up in delinquencies, but transparency in the space is limited and a significant percentage of CRE loans will require refinancing in the coming years (and at much higher rates when they were first taken out). If too many loans go bad quickly, that could create a bigger problem for those small banks that are under-reserved.
  
  Understanding industry trends are important to hone in on areas of stress. Here, the office sector – wracked by the widespread adoption of hybrid work – continues to face its own unique set of challenges while other areas still look solid (think industrial assets, logistics properties, manufacturing facilities, and warehouses). We don’t think stress and potential losses within office CRE are likely to destabilize the broader system. In all, it represents just 0.35% of U.S. GDP. 

• Credit is still tighter, but stabilizing. 
  Many worried that the spate of banking stress would harm growth, as tighter lending standards and profitability challenges led banks to reduce available financing and raise costs for small and medium sized businesses. To be sure, lending growth did slow. Yet, as we mentioned, the economy defied expectations, and now, loan growth is stabilizing again.

Tighter credit conditions are still a risk we’re monitoring. But while interest costs are higher and now take up a larger share of corporate and consumer income compared to the past, balance sheets and cash flows remain healthy overall. Some interest rate sensitive sectors, like housing and manufacturing, are even seeing some signs of green shoots.

What could be ahead: Searching for long-term solutions

As the drama unfolded, swift and coordinated action by the FDIC, Fed, Treasury, and even a consortium of U.S. banks did much to offer liquidity, reassure bank depositors, and still calm. As part of that, the Fed created a historic Bank Term Funding Program to provide emergency support. Now, in a sign of the more stable times, that program ended (as expected) last week. As we now move beyond the band-aid fixes, that poses the question: what is the long-term solution for banking sector stability?

Regulators are working to bolster the health of the banking system. The Fed and others are tightening their grip on capital requirements for banks through the likes of Basel III Endgame and other measures that increase the need for short-term liquidity. That signals that steps are being made in the right direction, but the balance between security and industry concerns is still a work in progress. Chair Powell signalled last week that the central bank is even considering a “broad” overhaul of its initial capital requirement proposals. 

That said, it’s worth noting one learning from the latest Q4 earnings season: The biggest, systemically important banks still signposted strong capitalization. That’s a good sign that large banks have a good buffer ahead of potential regulatory changes or even the risk of an economic slowdown. 

Finding opportunity through the risks

In the end, staying invested prevailed over the last year. It’s also worth noting last week marks the four-year anniversary of the start of the COVID drawdown, when the S&P 500 fell almost 10% in a single day. As an unexpected pandemic gripped the globe, it would have felt really tempting to hit “sell.” But if you’d held onto your investment, it would have grown over +120% from that day until now. 

Time makes a lot of difference. As we look forward and purvey the current landscape, we see a host attractive investment choices across asset classes. We believe stocks can continue to make new highs, and bonds are now in a different regime. And as much as tighter credit and stress is a risk, it can also create opportunity for investors. For instance, private lenders can collect a premium for providing capital, and stress-focused managers can take advantage of mispriced assets and loans in areas like commercial real estate.

As with the past year, investors should rely on steady hands to guide their long-term portfolios, and focus on investments that can protect and grow their wealth over time. Your J.P. Morgan team is here to discuss what portfolio options work best for you and your family.

All market and economic data as of March 18, 2023 and sourced from Bloomberg Finance L.P. and FactSet unless otherwise stated.

For illustrative purposes only. Estimates, forecasts and comparisons are as of the dates stated in the material.

There can be no assurance that any or all of these professionals will remain with the firm or that past performance or success of any such professional serves as an indicator of the portfolio’s success.

We believe the information contained in this material to be reliable but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. Opinions, estimates, and investment strategies and views expressed in this document constitute our judgment based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice.

This document may also have been made available in a different language, at the recipient’s request, and for convenience only. Notwithstanding the provision of a convenience copy, the recipient re-confirms that he/she/they are fully conversant and has full comprehension of the English language. In the event of any inconsistency between such English language original and the translation, including without limitation in relation to the construction, meaning or interpretation thereof, the English language original shall prevail.

This information is provided for informational purposes only. We believe the information contained in this video to be reliable; however we do not represent or warrant its accuracy, reliability or completeness, or accept any liability for any loss or damage arising out of the use of any information in this video. The views expressed herein are those of the speakers and may differ from those of other J.P. Morgan employees, and are subject to change without notice. Nothing in this video is intended to constitute a representation that any product or strategy is suitable for you. Nothing in this document shall be regarded as an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice (whether financial, accounting, legal, tax or other) given by J.P. Morgan and/or its officers or employees to you. You should consult your independent professional advisors concerning accounting, legal or tax matters. Contact your J.P. Morgan team for additional information and guidance concerning your personal investment goals.

Indices are not investment products and may not be considered for investment.

For illustrative purposes only. This does not reflect the performance of any specific investment scenario and does not take into account various other factors which may impact actual performance.

These are presented for illustrative purposes only. Your actual portfolio will be constructed based upon investments for which you are eligible and based upon your personal investment requirements and circumstances. Consult your J.P. Morgan representative regarding the minimum asset size necessary to fully implement these allocations. 

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

RISK CONSIDERATIONS 

• Past Performance is not indicative of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
• The prices and rates of return are indicative as they may vary over time based on market conditions. 
• Additional risk considerations exist for all strategies. 
• The information provided herein is not intended as a recommendation of or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any investment product or service. 
• Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other areas of J.P. Morgan. This material should not be regarded as investment research or a J.P. Morgan investment research report.

Index Definitions:

Standard and Poor’s 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The index was developed with a base level of 10 for the 1941–43 base period.

The NASDAQ-100 Index is a modified capitalization-weighted index of the 100 largest and most active non-financial domestic and international issues listed on the NASDAQ. No security can have more than a 24% weighting. The index was developed with a base value of 125 as of February 1, 1985. Prior to December 21,1998 the Nasdaq 100 was a cap-weighted index.