locate an office

offices near you

office near you

Investment Strategy

Asia Outlook 2024: A Year of Transition

Jan 22, 2024

Author: Asia Investment Strategy Team

 

Asian economies faced numerous challenges in 2023 – ranging from aggressive U.S. rate hikes to disappointing growth in China. Against a tough economic backdrop and lingering geopolitical risks, financial market performances were mixed amidst subdued capital flows. Local currencies generally weakened versus the dollar, even as many regional central banks shadowed the Fed’s hawkish stance. That said, the region still had some star performers in 2023. Equity markets in South Korea, Taiwan, India, and Japan saw strong double digit gains, supported by secular tailwinds and favorable fund flows.

2023 WAS A STRONG YEAR FOR SOME ASIAN EQUITY MARKETS

2023 price return, %

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P. Data as of December 2023. 
The bar-chart compares the 2023 total price return of 12 Asian equity markets in percentage terms, represented by the vertical axis which ranges from -20% to 30%. The horizontal axis lists the 12 markets being compared: Thailand, Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Indonesia, Vietnam, South Korea, India, Japan and Taiwan. The markets are arranged from left to right in ascending order of their 2023 price returns. Thailand delivered the lowest price return in 2023, at -14.8%, followed by Hong Kong at -13.8%, China at -11.4%, Malaysia at -2.3%, Philippines at -0.7% and lastly -0.3% for Singapore. The remaining 6 Asian equity markets delivered positive returns. Indonesia experienced a total price return of 6.16% and Vietnam at 11.85%. Equity markets in South Korea (18.7%), India (18.7%), Japan (24.6%) and Taiwan (27.2%) saw strong double-digit gains in 2023. Taiwan stands out with the highest total price return of 27.2% in 2023.
We expect 2024 to be a transitional year, with hopes of stability paving the way for a more sustained recovery in 2025. As growth in the developed world, particularly the U.S., is likely to slow into a soft landing, regional export growth could stay challenged in the near-term. A broad-based export recovery may have to wait until global growth can re-accelerate, possibly in late 2024 or 2025.

SOUTH-EAST ASIA'S* EXPORTS AND EXPORT DEMAND

Year-over-year change, 6-month moving average

Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management, CEIC, National Statistics Agencies, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, S&P Global, South-East Asia consists of Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. *Singapore export series used excludes re-exports. **The global manufacturing PMI – new export order series leads the South-East Asia export growth series by 3 months. Axis cut off to maintain reasonable scale. Guide to the Markets – Asia. Data reflect most recently available as of December 2023.
The line-chart shows the 6-month moving average of the year-over-year change in South-East Asia’s export growth, as represented by the dark blue line and the global manufacturing PMI – new export orders, represented by the light blue line from 2000 to 2024. Historically, the South-East Asia export growth tend to move in tandem with global manufacturing PMI – new export orders. When global manufacturing PMI – new export order goes up, South-East Asia export growth can be seen increasing as well, vice versa. In recent years, there was a general decline in global manufacturing PMI – new export orders from 54.7 in Jul 2021 to 46.4 in Nov 2023, with some slight fluctuations in between. The same trend can be seen for South-East Asia export growth where it fell from 0.07 in Jul 2021 to -0.07 in Nov 2023 despite a brief spike to 0.06 in Jun 2022. As we expect growth in the developed world to likely slow, a potential softening in Global manufacturing PMI – new export orders may lead to a slow down in South-East Asia export growth as well.
Another potential turning point may come when the Fed starts to ease monetary policy and cut interest rates. This will likely translate into easier financial conditions, and expectations for a potentially weaker USD may help lead capital flows back to emerging markets (EM). Once the Fed is on a durable cutting path, central banks in Asia will likely also have more leeway to ease policy slightly in order to give local growth a bit more support. India – and Southeast Asia to some degree – can benefit more in this scenario. 

MAJOR CENTRAL BANKS IN THE REGION ARE LIKELY TO BEGIN A SYNCHRONIZED EASING CYCLE LED BY THE U.S.

Forecasted change in central bank policy rates*, %

Source: CEIC, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. *Forecasts are based on forecasts estimated by J.P. Morgan Economic Research. Unseen markers are likely due to overlapping values. Guide to the Markets – Asia. Data reflect most recently available as of December 2023.
This dot plot chart shows the current interest rate, as represented by the blue dot, along with the 6-months, as represented by the light purple line, and 12-months, as represented by the dark purple line, forecasted change in central bank policy for Japan, Taiwan, China, Thailand, Malaysia, South Korea, the Eurozone, Australia, United Kingdom, United States, India and the Philippines. In the 10 years following the Great Recession in 2008, the United States has kept interest rates relatively low at sub 3 percent before cutting interest rates to near 0 after the onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020. In 2022, amid high inflation, the Federal Reserve began an aggressive hiking cycle and raised interest rates to 5.25-5.5% in July 2023, where it currently remains unchanged. As we expect the Fed to begin easing this year, it is likely that a US easing cycle will encourage other major central banks to also start lowering interest rates. Japan is an exception. The Bank of Japan has been operating negative interest policy since 2016, when Japan couldn’t achieve the price stability target of 2%. However, it is widely forecasted that Japan will likely abandon its negative interest policy this year as inflation in Japan is at 2.6% as of December 2023. Therefore, Japan will likely act in reverse to the United States and hike interest rates.

In this environment, emerging Asian currencies may see some additional support as headwinds from elevated energy prices and weak global trade gradually wane. Global financial conditions will likely also ease from highly restrictive levels as major central banks begin moving into a synchronized easing cycle. That said, we may need to wait until the second half of 2024 to see more sustained strength against the dollar, in line with our base case that the Fed could deliver the first rate cut in June.

Within the region, we could see differentiated performance amidst the concurrent forces of trade sensitivity, central bank divergence and geopolitics. Indonesian (IDR) and Thai (THB) currencies will likely remain supported by boosts to their current accounts as a result of robust commodity exports and continued tourism recovery respectively. The Indian Rupee (INR) is also relatively well positioned given its high carry and domestic orientation, as the Indian economy continues to benefit from cyclical and structural tailwinds. Risks around the Singaporean dollar (SGD) appear balanced given that inflation has already peaked in the city-state – and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is likely to follow the easing pace of global central banks. In contrast, the Chinese Yuan (CNH) and Taiwanese dollar (TWD) will likely remain as funding currencies on carry disadvantage and geopolitical overhang.

China’s lackluster growth is a problem for the Asian powerhouse, but also for closely-linked economies, particularly Hong Kong. In 2024 China will likely try to manage a transition away from real estate and into other sectors. We will be publishing a report to discuss the near and long-term growth outlook in China, the policy choices available and the investment implications. In short, while this transition is challenging, there are some policy options that can help to stabilize growth.

SOME ASIAN ECONOMIES ARE MORE EXPOSED TO CHINA'S DEMAND

Trade exposure to U.S. and China as % of GDP

Source: OECD, Haver Analytics. Data as of December 2019. 
The bar chart shows the percentage of exports consumed in the U.S. and China as a percentage of GDP for each economy. The countries with the highest percentage of exports consumed in the U.S. are: Vietnam (6.20%) Taiwan (3.86%) Thailand (3.13%) Korea (2.50%) UK (2.53%) The countries with the highest percentage of exports consumed in China are: Taiwan (3.83%) Vietnam (3.29%) Korea (2.29%) Thailand (2.56%) Australia (2.17%) In the case of India, exports consumed in the U.S and China make up 2.30% and 0.48% of GDP respectively. India’s economy can be seen to one of the be least exposed to China’s import demand as it has the 2nd lowest percentage of GDP for exports consumed in China among other economies.
Over the longer term, ongoing shifts in global trade flows that diversify out of China can continue to benefit the region’s economy through increased foreign direct investment (FDI) and gains in global export market share, particularly for some Southeast Asian economies like Vietnam and Indonesia.

EMERGING ASIA EX-CHINA EXPORT MARKET SHARE

% of global exports

Source: International Monetary Fund, Haver Analytics. Data as of July 2023.
The line chart shows the emerging Asia ex-China export market share, as a percentage of global exports from 2000 to 2023. The chart shows that the emerging Asia ex-China export market share has been increasing steadily from ~5.2% in 2000 to 7.9% in 2023, which means that emerging Asian countries are exporting a growing share of the world’s goods and services.

Across the region, we are constructive on the following opportunities:

  • Consider tactical opportunities in semiconductors, expressed through South Korean and Taiwanese equities.
  • Close structural underweights in Japan and access long-term corporate reform opportunities through active managers.
  • Increase long-term allocation to Indian equities to benefit from structural tailwinds.
  • Be selective on Chinese equities through specific sectors.

There have been some signs of a nascent pickup in the semiconductor cycle, which bodes well for tactical opportunities in South Korea and Taiwan.

Capex and production cutbacks in the Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) industry have begun to bear fruit, and we are seeing rising contract prices. We expect this to continue in 2024 as end-markets such as mobile phones, personal computers (PCs) and servers could potentially start to recover. In addition, there are fast-growing structural opportunities in high bandwidth memory that could disproportionately benefit Korean DRAM companies. We continue to see meaningful valuation re-rating potential for the equity market that would likely coincide with an earnings upgrade cycle over the next 12-months. South Korea could also be a beneficiary of elevated geopolitical tensions in the region.

For the Taiwan semiconductor universe, activity levels likely bottomed in 3Q23, and we are starting to see leading foundry companies guide slightly ahead of consensus. In addition to benefitting from a cyclical upturn in demand as inventory levels normalize, new secular growth drivers in the form of rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence are leading to increased demand for high performance computing chips. This will likely benefit leading-edge foundry services in the region. Earnings growth is expected to inflect higher in 4Q23 due to new key product launches and this will likely extend through 2024.

While inflation was a headache for policymakers across developed markets, Japan was possibly the only economy where inflation was welcomed. Ever since its property market bubble burst in the 1990s, Japan’s policymakers have kept an ultra-easy policy stance in attempts to stoke inflation. While inflation has indeed arrived in this cycle, Japan is still at an early stage of reflating its economy.

DIVERGENCE BETWEEN JAPAN’S NOMINAL AND REAL WAGE, WITH THE LATTER IN NEGATIVE TERRITORY

Indexed 2020 = 100, seasonally adjusted

Source: Ministry of Health, Labor & Welfare, Haver Analytics. Data as of November 2023. 
The chart is a line graph that compares Japan’s nominal and real wages from 2001 to 2023, where 100 represents the wage index in 2020. The nominal wage index is a measure of wages before inflation is taken in to account while the real wage index is a measure of wages after inflation is taken in to account. The nominal wage has been on a general decline from 111 in 2001 to 98 in 2013. This same trend can be seen for the real wage index where it fell from 115 in 2001 to 106 in 2013. After 2013, nominal wage index increased gradually from 98 in 2013 to 104 in Nov 2023. On the other hand, real wage index continued to decline from 106 in 2013 to 95 in Nov 2023. Since Jan 2022, there has been a growing divergence between Japan’s nominal wage and real wage index. As of Nov 2023, Japan’s nominal wage is at 103 while real wage index is below 100 at 95.
The bulk of initial inflation was imported, and as a result, real wage growth was negative in 2023. The subsequent squeeze on households dragged on the domestic demand recovery, which was only partially offset by fiscal support. It was also helped by the bright spot of a strong tourism recovery, where ex-China visitor numbers have recently reached record levels. 

JAPAN'S TOURISM RECOVERY HAS HELPED THE ECONOMY, EVEN WITHOUT CHINESE ARRIVALS

Tourist arrivals, millions

Source: Japan National Tourism Organization Haver Analytics. Data as of November 2023. 
The chart is a line graph that shows the number of tourist arrivals in Japan from 2012 to 2023. There are two lines on the graph, the dark blue line presents the total tourist arrivals while the red line represents tourist arrivals from China. The number of total arrivals in Japan increased from 0.68 million in 2012 to ~3 million in 2019. Similarly, the number of tourist arrivals from China increased from 0.14 million to 1 million in 2019. Both total tourist arrivals and number of tourist arrivals from China have been increasing steadily since 2012 until 2020, when there was a sharp dip due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Both total tourist arrivals and number of tourist arrivals from China plunged to 0 and remained depressed for an extended period of time from Apr 2020 to Feb 2022. It was only until Feb 2022 that we start to see a sharp rebound in total tourist arrivals in Japan from 0.06 million in Mar 2023 to 2.4 million in Nov 2023. Japan’s tourist arrivals from China only started to recover from Jan 2023, increasing slightly to 0.26 million in Nov 2023.

Slower global growth – particularly in developed markets and China – is a headwind this year, particularly for Japan’s important manufacturing sector. But there are also signs of a more virtuous reflationary cycle developing. This is supported by three factors: 1) a structurally tightening labor market; 2) a deliberately dovish policy to sustain positive inflation expectations; and 3) a revival in private sector investment.

Despite slower global growth, Japan could hold on to some of its reflation progress. A key data point to watch is the annual spring wage negotiations. A four to five percent wage gain can tip real wage growth into positive territory this year – in turn helping to support household spending.

JAPAN'S WAGE GROWTH HAS REACHED THE HIGHEST LEVELS IN DECADES

Spring wage increase, %

Source: Ministry of Health, Labor & Welfare, Haver Analytics. Data as of November 2023.
The line-chart shows the annual increase of Japan’s spring wage (Shunto) in percentage terms from 1993 to 2023. Spring wage growth started at approximately 3.90% in 1993, which steadily declined to hit a trough of 1.63% in 2003. From 2003 to 2013, wage growth remained relatively stagnant, hovering around 1.80% with slight fluctuations. It then saw a modest uptick, from 1.80% in 2013 to 2.38% in 2015 and stayed within a range of 2.10% - 2.40% until 2019. From 2019 to 2021, wage growth fell from 2.18% in 2019 to 1.86% in 2021 which was then followed by a sharp acceleration to hit 3.60% in 2023 - highest levels since 1993.

An improving corporate sector outlook and more pro-growth policies may also help sustain the recent boom in private sector investment. After decades of stagnant wages, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) will likely wait patiently to see clear signs of sustainable wage gains before making further policy adjustments. If more reflation progress is made, an exit from negative interest rates is a reasonable next step in 2H 2024. A rate hike is not impossible, but is not a base case in 2024 given that the risks of runaway inflation have already diminished. Overall, policy moves will likely be gradual, keeping real rates in firmly negative territory.

For the Japanese currency, interest rate differentials will be one of the key factors to watch. Changes in the rate gap between U.S. Treasuries and Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs) have driven 80% of the moves in USD-JPY over the past two years, and will likely remain the main factor underpinning the pair as we see more policy shifts from both the Fed and the BOJ in 2024. We think the yen could moderately strengthen this year to 133-137 on 1) increasing clarity that USD rates are past their peak; and 2) expectations of a gradual normalization of BOJ policies and higher JGB yields than current levels. Slow and subtle moves from the BOJ could imply only a gradual grind higher for JGB yields. 

INTEREST RATE DIFFERENTIALS HAVE DRIVEN OVER 80% OF MOVES IN USDJPY OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS

10-year UST-JGB spread (x-axis) vs. USDJPY (y-axis)

Sources: Bloomberg Finance L.P. Data as of January 17, 2024. UST = U.S. Treasury. JGB = Japan Government Bond.
The scatter-plot displays the correlation between the 10-year UST-JGB spread (difference in interest rates between 10-year US Treasury bonds and 10-year Japanese Government Bonds) and the USDJPY exchange rate. Each dot on the chart represents a data point, indicating the values of both variables at a specific time over the past 2 years. The dots generally form a pattern that slopes upward from left to right, suggesting a positive correlation between the two variables. The means that as the 10-year UST-JGB spread widens (meaning higher US interest rates relative to Japanese rates), then USDJPY exchange rate tends to rise which represents a stronger US dollar against the yen. 80% of the moves in USDJPY can be explained by the interest rate differentials between UST and JGB. The red dot on the chart titled “Today” represents the 10-year UST-JGB spread and USDJPY on January 17, 2024, 10-year UST-JGB spread and USDJPY was 3.44% and 147 respectively. The orange dot on the chart titled “YE’24 Outlook” highlights our expectations for 10-year UST-JGB spread and USDJPY by the end of 2024. We expect 10-year UST-JGB spread to decline and a subsequent decrease in USDJPY, which means a weakening of USD against the Japanese Yen.
2023 was one of the best years on record for Japanese equities, and the Nikkei 225 is tantalizingly close to its 1989 bubble era all-time high. However, recent weakness in global manufacturing purchasing managers’ indexes (PMIs) has started to negatively impact Japanese corporate earnings. The weak yen has helped cushion the net impact. Japanese corporate earnings have historically been correlated to global manufacturing PMIs, and they have been diverging with the earnings revision trend. This bears close attention and underpins our relatively neutral stance on the broad index from a cyclical perspective. That said, there are emerging trends that imply we could start to see moderate inflation return, and potentially a greater focus on expanding domestic capex. We are positive on such emerging themes over the broader market.

TOPIX EARNINGS REVISIONS NOT SUPPORTED BY RECENT PMI TRENDS

Earnings revisions vs. global manufacturing PMI

Source: J.P. Morgan Investment Bank, DataStream. Data as of October 2023.
The line chart plots TOPIX earnings revisions (light blue line) and global manufacturing PMI (dark blue line) from 2001 to 2023. The global manufacturing PMI surveys the general sentiment, output and employment intentions of global manufacturers. A level above 50 indicates economic expansion, while a number below 50 indicates a contracting economy which is represented by the axis on the right-hand side. The axis on the left-hand side represents TOPIX earnings revisions. Historically, there has been a strong correlation between TOPIX earnings and global manufacturing PMI where both indicators tend to move in tandem. This means that when global manufacturing activity increases, analysts tend to upgrade their earnings forecasts for Japanese companies. However, since February 2023, there has been a divergence between the TOPIX earnings revisions and global manufacturing PMI. Global manufacturing PMI has decreased from 49.9 in Feb-23 to 48.8 in Oct-23 but TOPIX earnings revision increased significantly from -3.8 in Feb-23 to 2.5 in Oct-23.

A longer term theme that is increasingly capturing market interest is the progress of corporate reform in Japan. As a result of regulatory reforms and new Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) ‘name-and-shame’ initiatives for companies trading below book value, Japanese corporates are increasingly returning more cash to shareholders in the form of increased dividends and share buybacks.

The ultimate objective of the TSE is to encourage active dialogue between Japanese corporates and shareholders in order to improve corporate governance, returns on equity, and valuations. A starting point is for companies to acknowledge what their cost of capital is, and for share price performance to be considered. Other areas of current focus include increased English company disclosure, quality of corporate governance, and the effectiveness of communication with investors. Even for companies trading at high price-to-book ratios, the TSE is requesting that they promote constructive dialogue aimed at improving corporate value over the medium to long term. As companies meet the TSE’s current requests there is an increasing likelihood that the Exchange could initiate other measures to further raise the corporate governance bar in the near future.

We estimate that the addressable market of companies that have reasonable market caps, net cash and/or large cross shareholdings, and low valuations, to be 100 to 150. This provides plentiful opportunities for alpha generation through active managers. In addition, this could further create a virtuous cycle in terms of continuous improvement in corporate governance across the broader market and lead to a moderate re-rating of Japanese equities. While there are near-term macro uncertainties, this trend is creating a potential multi-year idiosyncratic reason for investors to consider Japanese equities, and has increased the probability of our bull case scenario for the TOPIX (2,770-2,840). Clients that are under-allocated Japan can consider closing the underweight.

Investors have turned to EM for the promise of stronger economic growth, and these economies have indeed expanded at a faster pace than their developed market counterparts. But there is a twist, which many investors do not fully appreciate: In most EM economies, corporate earnings have failed to keep pace with GDP growth. India is a striking exception. It is one of the few emerging markets where equity investors can benefit from underlying economic growth. Indian company profits, and thus stock returns, have tended to grow in line with nominal GDP. Data over the past 20 years show that India has one of the closest relationships between economic growth and market returns.

FEW EMERGING MARKET EQUITY INDICES ACTUALLY TRACK GDP GROWTH IN THE LONG-TERM

Annualized nominal GDP growth vs local equity index returns since 2000, %

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., Haver Analytics. Data as of December 2022. Brazil = IBOV Index. China = CSI 300 Index. Hong Kong = Hang Seng Index. India = Sensex Index. Indonesia = Jakarta Composite Index. Malaysia = FTSE Bursa Malaysia Index. Mexico = S&P BMV IPC. Singapore = Straits Times Index. South Africa = FTSE/JSE Top40 Index. South Korea = KOSPI Index. 
The bar chart shows the annualized nominal GDP growth vs. local equity index price returns in percentage terms since 2000 for 11 emerging market countries. The chart highlights the relationship between GDP growth and equity returns. For example, China has had strong annualized nominal GDP growth at 10% but its equity market has underperformed with a return of only 0.6%. Similarly, Hong Kong’s annualized nominal GDP growth since 2000 is 4.16% but annualized local equity index return is -0.7%. On the other hand, India, Indonesia, South Africa and Taiwan equity indices performance tend to track GDP growth. This can be seen in the case of India where GDP growth is strong at 11.83% and equity market has also performed well, with a local equity index return of 10.7%.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions (LTCMAs) project that India’s economy will likely deliver nominal growth of around 10% annually over the next 10 to 15 years. In our view, this makes India one of the most compelling investment destinations in EM.

India’s growth potential reflects an expanding middle class, digitization and especially favorable demographics. India’s labor supply will likely increase steadily until the 2030s, and because labor supply is strongly linked to output, this gives it a long runway to deliver sustained high rates of economic growth.

INDIA’S LONG-TERM DEMOGRAPHICS STAND OUT POSITIVELY

(LHS) dependency ratio; (RHS) real GDP growth, %

Source: World Bank, United Nations, Haver Analytics, J.P. Morgan Private Bank. Data as of December 2022.
The line-chart shows the relationship between India’s dependency ratio (represented in dark blue line) and real GDP growth (represented in light blue line) from 1963 to 2040. The dependency ratio is the average number of economically dependent population per 100 economically productive population for a given country. A decrease in dependency ratio would mean an increase in labor supply. India’s dependency ratio declined from starting point of 81 in 1963 to 51 in 2016 while real GDP increased from 3.49% in 1963 to 7.38% in 2016. This was followed by a sharp decline in real GDP growth from the period of 2016 to 2018. Despite the occasional spikes and declines in real GDP growth rate over time, there is a general uptrend from 1963 to 2016 where dependency ratio is seen to be declining. This suggests a negative relationship between dependency ratio and real GDP growth for India.
India’s prospects look especially appealing at a time when China’s long-term growth potential has declined, with far-reaching effects for the global economy and EM in particular. For example, China represents one of the largest sources of trade demand for Korea and Taiwan, due to its large appetite for semiconductors. It also ranks as one of the largest importers and consumers of many major commodities, directly impacting leading commodity exporters such as Brazil and South Africa. In many ways, EM economies are highly correlated with China’s economic cycle. Indeed, given the market capitalization of Chinese companies, the country effectively dominates the broad EM complex. For that reason, India’s lack of correlation appeals to many investors. The lack of correlation also applies to equity market performance.

INDIAN EQUITIES EXHIBITED RELATIVELY LOW CORRELATIONS WITH CHINESE EQUITIES COMPARED TO OTHER MAJOR EMERGING MARKETS

Correlation of quarterly returns, Sep 2009 – Sep 2023

Sources: Bloomberg Finance L.P. Data as of September 2023.
The table chart shows the correlations between the quarterly returns of MSCI indices from Sep 2009 to Sep 2023 for China, Taiwan, India, Korean and Brazil. The correlations are represented by numbers between 0 and 1, with 1 being a perfect correlation and 0 being no correlation. The chart employes a color gradient to visually communicate the strength of correlations between the market indices. As the correlation decreases, the color shifts towards a lighter to darker shade of green. As the correlation values increase, the color transitions from a lighter to darker shade of red. The column in the dotted box shows the correlation of the quarterly returns of different emerging market indices with MSCI China. Particularly, MSCI India is shown to have the lowest correlation of 0.37 with MSCI China among other major emerging markets.

Indian equities are not undervalued. Stocks trade at forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples that are higher than their historical averages. But the long-term outlook for India’s economy and equity markets appears better than it has in years, for several reasons:

  • A likely sustained increase in foreign direct investment due to U.S.-China tensions and a redirection of supply chains benefiting India.
  • Companies have steadily reduced debt levels over the past 10 years, leaving room for a new credit cycle to emerge.
  • Structural reforms in the banking sector – a dominant component of the equity market –are designed to improve profitability and reduce risk.
  • India’s business-friendly policies (including lower corporate tax rates) and preferential credit terms to set up manufacturing facilities in the country.

The Indian economy continues to be supported by better than expected economic growth, where real GDP grew 7.6% in 3Q23, and PMI’s that remain firmly in expansionary territory. This is translating into year-on-year earnings growth that is estimated to reach ~15% for the December quarter.

We now turn our focus on the two largest sectors: Financials and Information Technology. Banks continue to be supported by solid loan growth on the retail side, and while there is some net interest margin pressure, asset quality remains benign. Mid to high-teens earnings growth for financials seems achievable. One segment of the market that has been under pressure in 2023 was the IT sector, which  has been dragged lower from weak outsourcing demand from overseas clients. Recently we have started to see demand from clients in geographies such as the U.S. inflect higher, leading to higher than expected orders, and the first guidance upgrade in a number of quarters. Looking forward into 2024 and 2025, we are of the view that earnings can continue to compound at a low to mid-teens level, which underpins our positive view on the equity market in the year ahead.

One potential risk is the general election expected to take place in April or May. We view the recent state elections positively for Mr. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The BJP turned two states (Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan) from the main opposition, and kept another (Madhya Pradesh) with clear majorities. The results are much better than the exit polls suggested and bode well for continued economic reform, a pro-business environment, and stability in India.

Finally, any assessment of 2024 would naturally involve the specter of geopolitics and its impact on the region’s economy and markets. Although oil prices have remained relatively contained on the back of strong supply, recent conflicts in the Middle East have led to spikes in shipping rates and concerns of a broader escalation engulfing the region, prompting fears that inflation may yet rear its ugly head again. While the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine simmers somewhat in the background, any escalation there could also impact broader commodity prices, in turn re-introducing inflation risks for importers such as India and Japan.

CONTAINER SHIPPING RATES HAVE SPIKED ON THE BACK OF MIDDLE EAST TENSIONS

World Container Index Composite freight benchmark rate per 40-foot box

Sources: Bloomberg Finance L.P. Data as of January 2024.
The line chart shows the World Container Index Composite freight benchmark rate per 40-foot box from Jan 2020 to Jan 2024. The Index measures the actual spot container freight rates for major East West trade routes, consisting of 8 route-specific indices representing individual shipping routes and a composite index. The World Container Index Composite freight benchmark rate per 40-foot box was at approximately 1800 in Jan 2020 which then saw a steady uptrend to a high of 10360 in Oct 2021. The index declined from its high of 10360 in Oct 2021 to 9670 in Nov 2021 and then hovered between the range of 9000 to 9700 with slight fluctuations from Nov 2021 to Mar 2022. From Mar 2022 onwards, there was a sharp decline from 9279 in Mar 2022 to 2138 in Dec 2022. It continued to decrease at a more gradual pace from 2138 in Dec 2022 to 1381 in Dec 2023. From Jan 2024 onwards, there was a spike in container shipping rates from 1660 in the start of Jan 2024 to 3072 in mid-Jan 2024 due to the recent escalation of tensions in the Middle East.

At the national level, more than half the world’s population (including Taiwan, Indonesia, India and South Korea within Asia) will be voting in national elections this year, which introduces yet another source of volatility to regional markets. The U.S. elections also bear close attention for anticipating potential shifts in engagement with Asia broadly, and China in particular. While U.S.-China tensions seem to have stabilized recently, uncertainty on that front will likely pick up over the course of the election year, particularly around trade policy. However, the structural theme of supply chain redirection and ‘friend-shoring’ seems likely to continue to the benefit of some economies in the region, but this will likely be slow-moving.

While we see tactical and strategic opportunities across the region, most of them are emerging markets with high levels of volatility and uncertainty, and sizing is important in a portfolio context. Taking a diversified approach of tactically hedging against risks and volatility in the near-term, such as through derivatives and gold, while allocating to structural growth themes in the long-term, is our recommended approach in a dynamic and transitional year for Asia and the world. 

All market and economic data as of January 22, 2024 and sourced from Bloomberg Finance L.P. and FactSet unless otherwise stated.

For illustrative purposes only. Estimates, forecasts and comparisons are as of the dates stated in the material.

There can be no assurance that any or all of these professionals will remain with the firm or that past performance or success of any such professional serves as an indicator of the portfolio’s success.

We believe the information contained in this material to be reliable but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. Opinions, estimates, and investment strategies and views expressed in this document constitute our judgment based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice.

This document may also have been made available in a different language, at the recipient’s request, and for convenience only. Notwithstanding the provision of a convenience copy, the recipient re-confirms that he/she/they are fully conversant and has full comprehension of the English language. In the event of any inconsistency between such English language original and the translation, including without limitation in relation to the construction, meaning or interpretation thereof, the English language original shall prevail.

This information is provided for informational purposes only. We believe the information contained in this video to be reliable; however we do not represent or warrant its accuracy, reliability or completeness, or accept any liability for any loss or damage arising out of the use of any information in this video. The views expressed herein are those of the speakers and may differ from those of other J.P. Morgan employees, and are subject to change without notice. Nothing in this video is intended to constitute a representation that any product or strategy is suitable for you. Nothing in this document shall be regarded as an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice (whether financial, accounting, legal, tax or other) given by J.P. Morgan and/or its officers or employees to you. You should consult your independent professional advisors concerning accounting, legal or tax matters. Contact your J.P. Morgan team for additional information and guidance concerning your personal investment goals.

Indices are not investment products and may not be considered for investment.

For illustrative purposes only. This does not reflect the performance of any specific investment scenario and does not take into account various other factors which may impact actual performance.

These are presented for illustrative purposes only. Your actual portfolio will be constructed based upon investments for which you are eligible and based upon your personal investment requirements and circumstances. Consult your J.P. Morgan representative regarding the minimum asset size necessary to fully implement these allocations. 

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

RISK CONSIDERATIONS 

  • Past Performance is not indicative of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
  • The prices and rates of return are indicative as they may vary over time based on market conditions. 
  • Additional risk considerations exist for all strategies. 
  • The information provided herein is not intended as a recommendation of or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any investment product or service. 
  • Opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other areas of J.P. Morgan. This material should not be regarded as investment research or a J.P. Morgan investment research report.

Index Definitions

The MSCI China Index captures large- and mid-cap representation across China A shares, H shares, B shares, Red chips, P chips and foreign listings (e.g., ADRs).

The MSCI India Index is designed to measure the performance of the large- and mid-cap segments of the Indian market.

The MSCI Taiwan Index is designed to measure the performance of the large- and mid-cap segments of the Taiwan market.

The MSCI Korea Index is designed to measure the performance of the large- and mid-cap segments of the South Korean market.

The MSCI Brazil Index is designed to measure the performance of the large- and mid-cap segments of the Brazilian market.

The World Container Index (WCI) is a composite index of container freight rates on eight major routes to/from the US, Europe, and Asia.

Contact us to discuss how we can help you experience the full possibility of your wealth.

Please tell us about yourself, and our team will contact you. 

*Required Fields

Contact us to discuss how we can help you experience the full possibility of your wealth.

Please tell us about yourself, and our team will contact you. 

Enter your First Name

> or < are not allowed

Only 40 characters allowed

Enter your Last Name

> or < are not allowed

Only 40 characters allowed

Select your country of residence

Enter valid street address

> or < are not allowed

Only 150 characters allowed

Enter your city

> or < are not allowed

Only 35 characters allowed

Select your state

> or < are not allowed

Enter your country code

Enter your country code

> or < are not allowed

Enter your phone number

Phone number must consist of 10 numbers

Please enter a valid phone number

> or < are not allowed

Only 15 characters allowed

Enter your phone number

Please enter a valid phone number

> or < are not allowed

Only 15 characters allowed

Tell Us More About You

0/1000

Only 1000 characters allowed

> or < are not allowed

Checkbox is not selected

Your Recent History

LEARN MORE About Our Firm and Investment Professionals Through FINRA BrokerCheck

 

To learn more about J.P. Morgan’s investment business, including our accounts, products and services, as well as our relationship with you, please review our J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Form CRS and Guide to Investment Services and Brokerage Products. 

 

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates (collectively "JPMCB") offer investment products, which may include bank-managed accounts and custody, as part of its trust and fiduciary services. Other investment products and services, such as brokerage and advisory accounts, are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS"), a member of FINRA and SIPC. Insurance products are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. JPMCB, JPMS and CIA are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.

 

Please read the Legal Disclaimer and the relevant deposit protection schemes in conjunction with these pages.

 

Click to access DPS website.

DEPOSIT PROTECTION SCHEME 存款保障計劃   JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.是存款保障計劃的成員。本銀行接受的合資格存款受存保計劃保障,最高保障額為每名存款人HK$500,000。   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. is a member of the Deposit Protection Scheme. Eligible deposits taken by this Bank are protected by the Scheme up to a limit of HK$500,000 per depositor.
INVESTMENT AND INSURANCE PRODUCTS ARE: • NOT FDIC INSURED • NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY • NOT A DEPOSIT OR OTHER OBLIGATION OF, OR GUARANTEED BY, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES • SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LOSS OF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INVESTED
Bank deposit products, such as checking, savings and bank lending and related services are offered by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Member FDIC. Not a commitment to lend. All extensions of credit are subject to credit approval.