Investment Strategy
1 minute read
Pushbacks and top tracks: A mid-year mixtape
Trending Insights
-
01
-
02
-
03
Equity markets and bond yields both traded in a narrow band last week. Investors should enjoy the calm while it lasts.
The first round of parliamentary elections in France on Sunday confirmed that Marine Le Pen’s far-right party is in pole position, although by a lesser margin than many had feared. The UK is next to head to the polls on Thursday, and markets are pricing a high probability that Keir Starmer’s Labour party will be moving into 10 Downing Street.
Markets are attuned to the risks that come with shifts in political power, particularly in countries like France and the UK, where government debt burdens have been growing rapidly. The aftermath of the UK mini budget saga in late-2022 is still fresh in the memory of investors, and serves as a reminder to the potential implications that “fiscally irresponsible” growth plans can have on financial markets.
Today, we focus our attention on the U.S., where last Thursday’s presidential debate looks to have put former President Trump in the driver’s seat just four months out from election day. With bouts of volatility across other global markets causing some jitters, we are taking the opportunity to dig into one of the most frequent questions that we get from clients: How worried should we be about the U.S. debt and deficit?
The U.S. fiscal trajectory has garnered significant attention since S&P Global downgraded the debt in 2011. Just last week, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) updated its projections for the federal budget that suggest a $2 trillion deficit this year and an increase in the debt to GDP ratio to over 120% (the highest ever) by 2034.
While financial markets and presidential candidates have shown indifference, it’s crucial to understand the underlying risks associated with wide deficits and high sovereign debt levels.
The bottom line for investors is that we don’t expect meaningful improvement in the trajectory for U.S. debt or deficits in the medium term. However, multi-asset portfolios should still be able to deliver for investors. Monetary policymakers have maintained credibility, investor demand for U.S. Treasury assets is still strong, and the tax base is robust.
That said, the risks are meaningful enough to consider adding non-U.S. dollar–denominated assets and “real assets” such as infrastructure, gold and commodities to traditional multi-asset portfolios. A focus on tax efficiency for U.S. taxpayers could also be prudent.
In the rest of the note, we will explain the five most prevalent concerns, and will assess the impacts that each might have on your portfolio.
1. High debt levels and wide deficits limit fiscal flexibility
The U.S. government’s wide deficit and elevated debt levels restrict its ability to respond effectively to future economic downturns. Historically, during recessions, governments boost spending to stimulate growth. However, the fiscal space for additional stimulus might be constrained by an already wide budget deficit. This could slow any economic recovery. That said, elevated yields provide ample monetary space to provide support should a downturn materialize.
Investment implication: Somewhat ironically, this suggests that Treasury bonds and other investment grade fixed income assets still have a critical role to play in multi-asset portfolios.
2. High debt levels and wide deficits could increase borrowing costs
As the federal deficit grows, so does the need to issue Treasury securities. While demand for Treasuries has remained robust, (at recent auctions, public demand was around 2.5x greater than supply), a continued increase in supply could lead to higher yields. This scenario would increase the government’s interest expenses, further exacerbating the fiscal burden. The CBO already projects that interest costs will rise to 6% of GDP by 2050 (double the 3% highs recorded in the 1990s) driven by the assumption that government spending will grow at a materially faster rate than revenues.
Investment implication: Potential upward pressure on bond yields emphasizes the need to add other sources of diversification against potential equity volatility, most notably real assets.
3. High debt levels and wide deficits could crowd out more productive spending
The CBO projects that by the mid 2030s, all federal revenues will be required to fund mandatory government spending alone: largely Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and interest on debt. At that point, the only way to finance basic functions such as defense, law enforcement, infrastructure and education would be to borrow more or to cut other discretionary spending.
This potential crowding out could impede long-term economic growth and innovation. Federal programs such as the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (1958), the Orphan Drug Act (1983) and the National Nanotechnology Initiative (2000) have been vital to innovation in communications, computing and biotechnology.
Investment implications: While this risk is present, investors should note that the federal government is still directly investing and incentivizing investment in critical areas such as infrastructure, climate technology and manufacturing, given the provisions contained in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill, the Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS Act. That is consistent with spending initiatives in Europe, too. Notably, artificial intelligence, perhaps the most important innovation for equity markets in a generation, is largely being financed by the private sector.
4. High debt levels and wide deficits will probably not lead to dollar depreciation and excess inflation
If markets begin to question the credibility of U.S. sovereign debt, the dollar could depreciate and inflation could accelerate. Although historical data suggests this risk is low in the medium term, it cannot be entirely ruled out. For instance, the UK faced a “mini” fiscal crisis in 2022, leading to a 10% depreciation of the pound. A similar scenario in the U.S. could erode the dollar’s purchasing power and increase import prices, contributing to inflation. However, this risk is mitigated by the credibility of U.S. monetary authorities and the dollar’s status as the primary global reserve currency.
Instability and excess inflation can occur when central banks finance government spending by buying sovereign debt or keeping interest rates artificially low. While the U.S. engaged in this “financial repression” during and after World War II, the Federal Reserve has decreased its holdings of government debt by $1.3 trillion over the last two years, and has raised interest rates to some of the highest levels in 30 years. Inflation expectations remained well anchored during the spike of 2022 and 2023, indicating the Fed’s focus on labor market and inflation outcomes.
The U.S. dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency provides a unique advantage. To be sure, the “BRICS+” economies are gaining geopolitical influence, and are trying to establish a rival trading and monetary system. However, the dollar still comprises around 60% of global foreign exchange reserves, is involved in 90% of global transactions, and is used in over half of all global trade.
Investment implications: While this risk is low, the clear hedge against potential dollar depreciation is an allocation to non-USD assets and gold. That is particularly pertinent with the U.S. dollar trading near its strongest level in over 20 years (outside of a brief period in 2022).
5. High debt levels and wide deficits will most likely not lead to a government default
The likelihood of the U.S. (or any other developed economy for that matter) defaulting on its debt remains extremely low (technical defaults due to the statutory debt limit are a different story). The U.S. benefits from issuing debt in its own currency, which is also the global reserve currency. This unique position allows for a higher debt-carrying capacity compared to countries such as Argentina and Turkey, which issue debt in foreign currencies. Additionally, the U.S. has a robust tax base and the ability to raise revenues through tax reforms if necessary. Japan, with a debt-to-GDP ratio of 228%, provides a useful example of a country that has managed to avoid a fiscal crisis despite twice the indebtedness of the U.S.
Because all U.S. debt is dollar denominated, there is an extremely limited likelihood that the federal government would not be able to repay. The risk is that the government does it with dollars that have lost a significant amount of value relative to other currencies or assets such as gold. The most extreme example of this for a major economy was France in the 1920s.
Investment implications: While the fiscal outlook may appear challenging, the structural advantages of the U.S. economy and its currency provide a significant buffer against default risk.
The most likely scenario for the next few years is the status quo: Deficits remain wide and debt levels continue to rise. Despite the associated risks, we believe these won’t destabilize multi-asset portfolios due to the credibility of policymakers, ongoing investor demand for U.S. Treasury assets and a robust tax base.
There are methods to address the debt problem. One option is preemptive fiscal reform, which could involve altering entitlement or discretionary spending, and/or raising taxes on high-net-worth individuals or corporations. Another is higher economic growth through productivity gains. Specifically, advancements in artificial intelligence could enhance fiscal sustainability by boosting economic output without causing inflation. The CBO does not, and has not historically, forecasted these types of productivity booms.
Finally, we should note that the CBO has shown a tendency to develop overly pessimistic projections for the U.S. debt and deficits. For instance, in 2009 the CBO projected that mandatory government spending would outstrip total U.S. revenues by 2024. That intersection has been revised further into the future to 2034.
For investors, the message is clear: It is probably prudent to move beyond the traditional 60/40 portfolio. Including non-U.S. dollar assets and real assets such as infrastructure, gold and commodities can provide a hedge against potential dollar depreciation and inflation. As always, understanding the risks and incorporating them into your planning process is the best way to achieve your financial goals.
All market and economic data as of July 2024 and sourced from Bloomberg Finance L.P. and FactSet unless otherwise stated.
We believe the information contained in this material to be reliable but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. Opinions, estimates, and investment strategies and views expressed in this document constitute our judgment based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice.
RISK CONSIDERATIONS
We can help you navigate a complex financial landscape. Reach out today to learn how.
Contact usLEARN MORE About Our Firm and Investment Professionals Through FINRA BrokerCheck
To learn more about J.P. Morgan’s investment business, including our accounts, products and services, as well as our relationship with you, please review our J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Form CRS and Guide to Investment Services and Brokerage Products.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates (collectively "JPMCB") offer investment products, which may include bank-managed accounts and custody, as part of its trust and fiduciary services. Other investment products and services, such as brokerage and advisory accounts, are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS"), a member of FINRA and SIPC. Insurance products are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. JPMCB, JPMS and CIA are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.
Please read the Legal Disclaimer in conjunction with these pages.