Economy & Markets
1 minute read
Germany’s general election is fast approaching on February 23. As Europe's largest economy, accounting for roughly a quarter of the EU's GDP, Germany's political landscape holds significant sway over economic growth, trade, and investment opportunities across the continent.
Here, we delve into the potential outcomes of Germany's fourth snap election in its post-war history and what it could mean for global investors navigating a rapidly evolving political and economic environment.
Germany's election follows 2024’s tumultuous “year of elections,” which saw nearly half of the world’s population called to vote. The status quo was challenged as frustrations mounted over issues like inflation and immigration. That made it a hard year for incumbents and traditional parties, creating opportunities for right-wing candidates.
That context is notable, as the path to Germany's election wasn’t ordinary. Originally slated for September, the election was brought forward due to the collapse of the governing coalition late last year. Disagreements over managing Germany's economic stagnation were rife: its economy has not grown since the pandemic. That makes its performance the worst among the euro area's major economies.
Federal elections in Germany determine the composition of the Bundestag, or the national parliament. The proportional electoral system requires parties to clear a 5% hurdle to secure seats, setting the stage for the government's course over the next four years. The Bundestag will then appoint the Chancellor.
Before the most recent government collapse, the Bundestag was governed by a coalition of the Social Democrats (SPD), Free Democratic Party (FDP), and Greens.
Forming a coalition in the wake of recent political volatility could prove complex. While election results will be available soon after polls close, clarity on the new government may take time. Historically, coalitions have formed within 1-2 months, but there have been notable exceptions, such as in 2017, which took almost six months to resolve.
While polls aren’t always the most reliable indicator, small changes can have a big impact on how the seats stack up to form a government. Right now, the center-right Christian Democrats (CDU)/Christian Social Union (CSU) are leading in the polls heading into Sunday’s election. From there, whether smaller parties cross the 5% threshold matters. If they do, forming a coalition could require three parties (rather than two), potentially making the process harder for the CDU/CSU.
Chancellor Scholz’s Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) is still a contender to join forces with the CDU/CSU, but the smaller Greens party and, more recently, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), have been gaining traction. The Afd’s growing popularity in particular raises the possibility of forming a “blocking minority” that could obstruct proposed reforms, especially if they and other small parties secure over 33% of the votes. This would likely require collaboration with parties like FDP and/or BSW, both of which currently fall below the 5% threshold.
While all parties are focused on near-term economic stabilization and medium-term economic reform, their tactics, proposed scale, and prioritization differ. We identify five key policy priorities evident on the campaign trail:
1. The debt brake:
Germany's fiscal rules, particularly its "debt brake," are contentious. Enshrined in the constitution after the 2008 financial crisis, it limits the central government's budget deficit to 0.35% of GDP. That’s considerably more limiting than the broader EU rule at 3% of GDP, and a far cry from the 6-7% deficit that the United States has been running.
Critics argue this restricts borrowing capacity, despite Germany's ‘room’ to spend more given its relatively low debt-to-GDP ratio of 60%.
This seems especially challenging considering rising healthcare and pension costs over the next legislative period, along with widespread calls for increased defense spending. Those liabilities eat into much of the available budget before even considering potential new growth initiatives of the new government. For that reason, some degree of reform to the debt brake seems likely in our view, unless the AfD is able to form a blocking minority.
2. Deindustrialization:
Once a global growth powerhouse, Germany's industrial sector is now sputtering.
The sector was dealt a blow from China's post-COVID growth slowdown, reducing demand from Germany as a key export partner. Soon thereafter, an energy crisis unfolded amid the war in Ukraine. All that made it even harder for Germany to embark on transitioning its cornerstone auto industry from internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to electric vehicles (EVs). In turn, it’s lost ground to U.S. and Chinese rivals.
The next government is now tasked with regaining that competitive edge, considering options like investing in renewable energy infrastructure, reducing network charges, and lowering electricity taxes. Those challenges will also need to be tackled in the crosshairs of unfolding trade tensions, with potential U.S. tariff threats looming.
3. The new economy:
This priority isn’t unique to Germany. The euro area has been in the process of transitioning its “old economy,” marked by export-heavy, low-growth industries, towards higher-growth industries like technology.
While all parties are aligned on the goal of fostering growth through the likes of digitalization, AI, and startups, their tactics differ. The CDU/CSU favors deregulation to stimulate innovation, while the SPD and Greens support government subsidies for specific sectors. But, with fiscal rules again in mind, it’s a question of how much can be implemented.
4. Tax reform:
Along the campaign trail, reforming Germany's tax code has been intertwined with growth plans.
The CDU/CSU aims to lower personal and corporate taxes, potentially aligning the corporate tax rate with the UK and US at 25%. The SPD and Greens focus on tax relief for low and middle-income households.
Such policies could alleviate pressure on businesses and households, but would also create a sizeable financing gap and face scrutiny for the potential fiscal impact.
5. Immigration & the labor force:
Migration has been a key issue, with general agreement on incentivizing skilled worker immigration amid an aging population. However, the level of openness to broad immigration has been hotly debated.
The landing point will matter – but its impact likely won’t be felt for a few years, as labor force and demographic dynamics adjust.
Riding the train of Europe's economic growth has felt frustratingly sluggish, with momentum barely gathering steam. On one hand, this steady pace has allowed many European countries, including Germany, to avoid the overbuilding and debt excesses seen elsewhere. However, it has also led to the neglect of structural issues that demand significant investment.
Germany has acted as a heavy carriage, burdened by challenges in the automotive sector, energy dependence, and a tough environment for innovation. However, it isn’t the only culprit that has been a drag on the region. France is grappling with its own political challenges and fiscal pressures, and Italy is facing slow growth and an aging population. Woes for the region have only been intensified by the potential threat of U.S. tariffs. The EU, especially manufacturing-intensive economies like Germany, would be significantly affected if implemented.
It isn’t all bad though. Spain and Portugal have recently injected some vitality through a revival in tourism and services, and some relief may come from the European Central Bank's easing path. Developments in potential Ukraine-Russia ceasefire discussions could further boost the economy if they lead to lower energy costs, and looser fiscal policy, including addressing Germany's debt brake debates, could also mark a significant transition for Europe's economy.
Such efforts, if realized, will take time to have a material impact. Growth, both in Germany and across the region, is expected to remain limited in 2025.
Despite all the uncertainty, it may seem surprising that European stocks are at record highs. The Stoxx Europe 600 has outperformed the S&P 500 in the first six weeks of 2025, and Germany's DAX Index has slightly outpaced U.S. stocks over the last four years.
That offers an important lesson: The market is not the economy. Recent strength has been driven by better-than-expected earnings and a long-awaited recovery in valuations.
To us, the recent rally may present an opportunity to check-in on portfolios and any home country biases. A 2021 study found that German investors allocated 58% of their assets to domestic stocks, even though Germany makes up only 2% of the MSCI All-Country World Index.1 We see similar trends across Europe, and such a bias can potentially limit returns and increase exposure to domestic risks.
Within European markets, we are focused on sectors poised for growth. An uncertain geopolitical backdrop, combined with efforts to stabilize and rebuild growth, highlight the importance of themes like global security, the AI value chain, and consumer strength. To that end, Europe hosts a number of leading technology firms, particularly in semiconductors and software. The industrials sector is revving up, driven by its essential role in supplying critical inputs along both the AI and the aerospace and defense supply chains. And more recently, the luxury sector has been rebounding alongside stronger U.S. consumer demand.
Finally, as the ECB cuts interest rates, we see opportunities in extending duration in European fixed income. A weaker euro may also make an attractive borrowing currency.
Above all, often the best course of action through elections, geopolitical flashpoints, economic change, or any source of uncertainty, is to ensure your portfolio is aligned with your long-term goals.
Your JPMorgan team is here to help navigate these developments and explore potential opportunities.
All market and economic data as of February 2025 and sourced from Bloomberg Finance L.P. and FactSet unless otherwise stated.
We believe the information contained in this material to be reliable but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. Opinions, estimates, and investment strategies and views expressed in this document constitute our judgment based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice.
RISK CONSIDERATIONS
We can help you navigate a complex financial landscape. Reach out today to learn how.
Contact usLEARN MORE About Our Firm and Investment Professionals Through FINRA BrokerCheck
To learn more about J.P. Morgan’s investment business, including our accounts, products and services, as well as our relationship with you, please review our J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Form CRS and Guide to Investment Services and Brokerage Products.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates (collectively "JPMCB") offer investment products, which may include bank-managed accounts and custody, as part of its trust and fiduciary services. Other investment products and services, such as brokerage and advisory accounts, are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS"), a member of FINRA and SIPC. Insurance products are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. JPMCB, JPMS and CIA are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.
Please read the Legal Disclaimer in conjunction with these pages.