Rate-cutting playbook: Investment strategies for offense and defense

Last week's macro data pushed large-cap equities to their best performance streak in over a month.

The S&P 500 was up 3.9% last week, the best weekly performance since November. It was a broad rally. Small caps (Solactive 2000, +3.1%) were up, and mega caps (“Magnificent 7,” +6.3%) have outperformed.

Performance was driven by a weeklong run of favorable data across producer prices, consumer prices, retail sales and jobless claims. This has helped quell market slowdown fears sparked by the July Jobs Report. Prices were in line with or lower than Street expectations, initial claims (those applying for unemployment insurance) were lower, and the control measure of retail sales (what is used in the GDP calculation) tripled market forecasts.

Stronger data pushed yields higher on the short end of the curve, but ended the week with the 2-year yield unchanged and the 10-year yield lower by 5 basis points (bps).

In micro news, Walmart (+8.1%), the largest private employer in the United States, reported second-quarter earnings. The retailer raised its sales growth guidance for the year 4.75% (versus expectations of 4%). Management also gave an upbeat description of the consumer as: “Each part of the business is growing—store and club sales are up, and eCommerce is compounding.” Shares of Starbucks (+26%) got a caffeine kick last week when the coffee chain announced it will replace its CEO with Brian Niccol, the current Chipotle CEO. The news caused some indigestion for shares of Chipotle, which were down -5.5%. The stir in management comes as activist investors Elliott Investment Management and Starboard Value have amassed stakes in Starbucks.

With last week’s moves behind us, we look ahead and describe below the playbook in a rate-cutting cycle.

The rate-cutting playbook

Last week’s inflation and labor market data will free up the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates in September on its own terms. Futures markets are pricing in 100% probability of a 25-basis-point cut with about a 25% chance of 50 bps. We think investors should dust off their rate-cutting cycle playbooks to position their portfolios. Like a well-balanced playbook, there’s two sides to consider: offense and defense.

Defense: Bonds may have your back

Investors will likely start earning less on their cash in just 30 days. Now may be the time to consider moving out of excess cash and extend duration by buying bonds.

Why buy bonds? When you buy a bond, you capture elevated yields for longer. For example, cash yields on T-bills are still quoted above 5%, but that’s doesn’t give you the full picture. Rather, that quoted figure represents the annualized yield on a bill that matures in three months. In reality, that 5% yield means you earn 1.2% total over the next three months, and then you have to reinvest at the prevailing rate. In other words, as the Fed cuts rates, yields on T-bills should drop quickly.

Yields have already dropped. Are you too late? We believe the answer is no, even if 10-year yields have already declined by nearly 80 bps from this year’s peak. Historically, buying bonds one month prior to the first cut of a cycle delivers nearly 300 bps of excess return relative to waiting until one month after the Fed has started cutting.

Starting yield doesn’t tell the whole story. Bond prices often rise when interest rates fall, whereas cash yields remain relatively stable. For example, if you invested in a product with little to no duration, like short-term Treasury bills, you would receive the current yield over the investment period. In contrast, investing in a product with duration, like core bonds, offers the potential for both yield and price appreciation if interest rates decrease.

To illustrate, if interest rates were to decrease by 100 basis points, a hypothetical investment of in core bonds which has duration would likely result in higher returns compared to cash. 

Bonds can play a key role in a defensive investment strategy by providing capital preservation, income enhancement, and diversification. As a potential rate-cutting cycle approaches, consider incorporating bonds and extending duration in a defensive strategy.

Offense: Recovery in rate-sensitive sectors

Rate-cutting cycles also offer the opportunity to play some offense, particularly in those sectors that have underperformed in part due to higher rates. Below we highlight three areas that could recover with lower rates:

• Refinancing: Over 60% of homeowners in the United States own their homes through a mortgage. Through the hiking cycle, mortgage rates climbed to over 8% from ~3%, and have since fallen back to ~7%. The higher rate environment has deterred new homebuyers from entering the market, and existing home owners from relocating. The move lower in rates could provide a welcome relief to hopeful homeowners and folks who took out a mortgage near the highs. We’re already seeing signs of this. The MBA Refinancing Index had its biggest weekly jump since 2020. Even though refinancing is still dormant relative to 2021’s binge, the tick higher is a positive sign that home equity could act as a source of support for the consumer, spending and residential projects as rates fall.
• CRE: Following the fastest Fed hiking cycle since the early 1980s, aggregate CRE property prices have fallen by 12% since their peak in 2022, marking the third correction in U.S. CRE property prices in the last 30 years. 

Much of the impairment has been concentrated in the office sector. As Michael Cembalest, Chairman of Market and Investment Strategy for J.P. Morgan Asset & Wealth Management, noted in his latest piece,~25% of workers are working from home, leading to leasers giving back 10–12% of their rented spaces. As such, developers have been considering taking aging office buildings and turning the properties into housing. Those conversions are picking up in New York, as office vacancies have risen since the pandemic. Lower financing rates can encourage developers to take on these conversions, and a lower discount rate should support property values.

• M&A: Just last week, Mars Incorporated, the food manufacturer and packager, agreed to buy Kellanova, maker of Pringles. The deal will total nearly $36 billion composed of debt and a 33% per share premium on Kellanova’s equity. Elsewhere, a Bloomberg article last week reported that Skydance’s Paramount deal is now open to competition. M&A activity has been muted this year: Volumes are 20% below the 10-year average. The Mars deal, the second-largest year-to-date, along with investors competing for current deals, may signal green shoots for the industry into the impending rate-cutting cycle.

Whether you want to play offense, defense or a little bit of both, now is the time to prepare for a rate-cutting cycle. Your J.P. Morgan team is here to help. 

The examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual performance. 

Standard and Poor’s 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

The Solactive 2000 Index is an index that tracks the performance of the 1,001–3,000 largest companies in the US stock market. The index is based on company market capitalization and weighted by free float market capitalization.

The VIX Index is a calculation designed to produce a measure of constant, 30-day expected volatility of the U.S. stock market, derived from real-time, mid-quote prices of S&P 500® Index call and put options.

The Magnificent 7 stocks is a collection of high-performing companies in the U.S. stock market. They are: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla.

All companies referenced are shown for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended as a recommendation or endorsement by J.P. Morgan in this context.

By visiting a third-party site, you may be entering an unsecured website that may have a different privacy policy and security practices from J.P. Morgan standards. J.P. Morgan is not responsible for, and does not control, endorse or guarantee, any aspect of any linked third-party site. J.P. Morgan accepts no direct or consequential losses arising from the use of such sites.​

Bonds are subject to interest rate risk, credit and default risk of the issuer. Bond prices generally fall when interest rates rise.