Investment Strategy
1 minute read
While uncertainty around the Middle East conflict continues to dominate the headlines, AI and tech remains one of our top investment themes. Critically, this is a theme that extends beyond the U.S., with the structural growth opportunity in AI playing out across China’s technology ecosystem as well. China stands out due to its relative insulation from the recent upheavals in energy prices (courtesy of its diversified and domestic energy sources), as well the heavy emphasis on AI adoption and monetization by its policymakers.
In this note, we focus on key emerging themes within the China tech sector, covering AI investment trends, profitability, fundamental shifts in subscription models, and overseas expansion. We highlight company-specific case studies for each theme with a focus on takeaways from the recent earnings season. In short, despite the recent mixed earnings picture, we see favorable opportunities in Chinese tech for investors willing to be selective and stay the course.
The latest earnings season from China’s technology companies highlights a structural shift underway across the sector. The near-term earnings outlook remains uneven due to heavy reinvestment and mixed signals around AI capex. However, overseas expansion, evolving business models, and competitive dynamics suggest China tech is entering a new phase of execution-driven differentiation, rather than broad, macro-led beta exposure.
1) Clear acceleration of AI related capex: reinvestment cycle is gaining momentum
A consistent theme across leading Chinese tech companies is the continued acceleration of AI-related capital expenditure, with management teams increasingly explicit about execution, scale, and monetization roadmaps. Here are some examples from industry leaders:
Alibaba’s management emphasized that AI investment is no longer experimental, but firmly execution-driven, anchored around a token-based monetization framework. External cloud revenue growth has re-accelerated into the mid-30% range, while AI-related demand has sustained triple digit growth rates for ten consecutive quarters, driving both revenue and EBITA acceleration at the Cloud Intelligence group within the firm. Importantly, growth is increasingly driven by Model as a Service (MaaS) adoption and inference workloads, rather than one off training contracts, suggesting a more sustainable outlook. Alibaba’s AI strategy is now visibly full stack, spanning the Qwen model family, T Head in house chips, and hyperscale cloud infrastructure, integrated through platforms such as Alibaba Token Hub to capture rising token consumption across enterprise and consumer use cases.
Tencent is pursuing a different go-to-market approach but reinforced the same reinvestment message. Management framed 2026 as a year of heavier AI investment, with monetization already emerging in core businesses such as advertising, Weixin Search, Video Accounts, gaming, and cloud services, even as new AI-native products remain in incubation.
More broadly, the industry-wide shift from training heavy AI workloads toward inference-driven demand materially improves utilization rates, pricing flexibility, and margin potential over time. This reinforces the view that AI cloud growth can increasingly translate into operating leverage, rather than remaining as a cost center. The message is clear: AI capex is still rising, and management teams are increasingly willing to tolerate near-term margin pressure to secure long term positioning in AI infrastructure and ecosystems.
2) Profit margins are stabilizing despite heavy capex
Profitability trends across China tech suggest stabilization rather than expansion, with margins still under pressure as companies prioritize reinvestment. At Alibaba, ongoing investments into AI, cloud, and quick commerce weighed on near-term earnings. Consensus has revised down FY27 earnings by mid-teens percentage points, largely reflecting heavier capex and opex associated with AI and new growth initiatives. Buybacks will likely also moderate as capital is redirected toward investment.
Tencent provides a clear illustration of the earnings trade-off. Management highlighted strong early signals from OpenClaw, and sees additive revenue and earnings sources over the medium-term beyond chatbots. However, investment costs are also front loaded. Spending on AI-native products such as Yuan Bao and Hun Yuan totaled RMB 18bn, with guidance that this figure could double in 2027 (even excluding other AI initiatives). As a result, while topline growth could remain in the low-teens, mid-teens earnings growth is unlikely in 2026 with high single-digit growth more realistic due to margin pressures.
In other examples, DiDi reported margin improvements at the unit level, but profitability remains sensitive to competition, labor costs, and reinvestment needs. Xiaomi’s situation is mixed: rising memory prices weighed on handset gross margins, while electric vehicle margins expanded on scale effects. Overall, blended margins still increased by 1.4ppt.
Overall, we are still confident that China’s corporate margins have already bottomed in 4Q25 and remain on track for gradual recovery in 2026, albeit with uneven pacing across sectors and companies.
3) Subscription models are being challenged, mirroring trends seen in U.S. peers
The earnings season also underscores that Chinese software and platform subscription models are facing pressures similar to those seen among U.S. peers, as AI, competition, and consumer behavior reshape monetization structures. Tencent Music Entertainment (TME) is a clear example. The company is transitioning from a cleaner subscription compounding narrative toward a broader but less visible multi-engine monetization model. This shift matters because TME’s historical re-rating was driven not only by growth, but by investor confidence in recurring revenues, transparent KPIs (key performance indicators), and predictable ARPU (average revenue per use) expansion.
Subscription revenue growth is likely to slow, and management has signaled reduced emphasis on quarterly subscription KPIs. While the long-term strategic logic of revenue diversification is sound, the near-term consequence is a transition from a pure subscription story to a more complex ecosystem model with less immediate visibility – which could weigh on valuations.
This dynamic mirrors broader global software trends, reinforcing that China tech is not insulated from the structural evolution affecting platform monetization worldwide.
4) Overseas expansion is accelerating and continuing to bear fruit
While international expansion has long been a strategic priority for Chinese tech companies, recent results suggest that only a subset of early movers are beginning to see tangible payoffs.
BYD continues to progress materially ahead of expectations outside China. The construction and ramp up of BYD’s Hungary and Indonesia plants are running one to two quarters ahead of plan. The YTD export run rate implies 900,000 to 1 million overseas unit sales in 2026, more than double last year’s ~420,000 and above management’s prior guidance of 800,000 units. The company is rapidly broadening its overseas product portfolio, ranging from mass market EVs to premium offerings. These developments suggest that BYD’s overseas expansion is no longer just volume driven, but increasingly portfolio and brand driven, supporting a more durable global positioning. Xiaomi also continues to push overseas across devices and EVs, but remains earlier in the monetization curve. Progress is strategic rather than immediately earnings-accretive.
By contrast, not all overseas efforts are delivering results. DiDi and Meituan continue to record losses in their international businesses, highlighting that scale, regulatory complexity, and local competition remain significant hurdles. Overseas expansion may remain in the investment phase for many companies, but could emerge as a key profit driver over the longer term.
China tech is no longer driven primarily by consumer traffic growth, new game launches or discretionary advertising cycles. Instead, the center of gravity is shifting toward AI-enabled productivity, cloud infrastructure, and embedded monetization within large ecosystems.
The broader implication is that the Chinese equity market — and tech in particular — is transitioning from a macro-driven, policy-discounted asset class to one where company-specific execution, scale, and competitive positioning matter more for investors. While recent earnings results were mixed, they also point to future tailwinds from AI driven monetization, cloud scale and ecosystem leverage. Investors who stay the course through recent volatility, and are selective about which companies to hold, will potentially be rewarded.
For illustrative purposes only. Estimates, forecasts and comparisons are as of the dates stated in the material. Indices are not investment products and may not be considered for investment.
All market and economic data as of March 2026 and sourced from Bloomberg Finance L.P. and FactSet unless otherwise stated.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns and investors may get back less than the amount invested.
JPMAM Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions
Given the complex risk-reward trade-offs involved, we advise clients to rely on judgment as well as quantitative optimization approaches in setting strategic allocations. Please note that all information shown is based on qualitative analysis. Exclusive reliance on the above is not advised. This information is not intended as a recommendation to invest in any particular asset class or strategy or as a promise of future performance. Note that these asset class and strategy assumptions are passive only – they do not consider the impact of active management. References to future returns are not promises or even estimates of actual returns a client portfolio may achieve. Assumptions, opinions and estimates are provided for illustrative purposes only. They should not be relied upon as recommendations to buy or sell securities. Forecasts of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable, but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. This material has been prepared for information purposes only and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice. The outputs of the assumptions are provided for illustration/discussion purposes only and are subject to significant limitations.
“Expected” or “alpha” return estimates are subject to uncertainty and error. For example, changes in the historical data from which it is estimated will result in different implications for asset class returns. Expected returns for each asset class are conditional on an economic scenario; actual returns in the event the scenario comes to pass could be higher or lower, as they have been in the past, so an investor should not expect to achieve returns similar to the outputs shown herein. References to future returns for either asset allocation strategies or asset classes are not promises of actual returns a client portfolio may achieve. Because of the inherent limitations of all models, potential investors should not rely exclusively on the model when making a decision. The model cannot account for the impact that economic, market, and other factors may have on the implementation and ongoing management of an actual investment portfolio. Unlike actual portfolio outcomes, the model outcomes do not reflect actual trading, liquidity constraints, fees, expenses, taxes and other factors that could impact the future returns. The model assumptions are passive only – they do not consider the impact of active management. A manager’s ability to achieve similar outcomes is subject to risk factors over which the manager may have no or limited control.
The views contained herein are not to be taken as advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any investment in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit and accounting implications and determine, together with their own financial professional, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be appropriate to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yield are not a reliable indicator of current and future results.
Diversification and asset allocation does not ensure a profit or protect against loss.
Investments in commodities may have greater volatility than investments in traditional securities, particularly if the instruments involve leverage. The value of commodity-linked derivative instruments may be affected by changes in overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates, or factors affecting a particular industry or commodity, such as drought, floods, weather, livestock disease, embargoes, tariffs and international economic, political and regulatory developments. Use of leveraged commodity-linked derivatives creates an opportunity for increased return but, at the same time, creates the possibility for greater loss.
When investing in mutual funds or exchange-traded and index funds, please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses associated with the funds before investing. You may obtain a fund’s prospectus by contacting your investment professional. The prospectus contains information, which should be carefully read before investing.
Structured product involves derivatives. Do not invest in it unless you fully understand and are willing to assume the risks associated with it. The most common risks include, but are not limited to, risk of adverse or unanticipated market developments, issuer credit quality risk, risk of lack of uniform standard pricing, risk of adverse events involving any underlying reference obligations, risk of high volatility, risk of illiquidity/little to no secondary market, and conflicts of interest. Before investing in a structured product, investors should review the accompanying offering document, prospectus or prospectus supplement to understand the actual terms and key risks associated with the each individual structured product. Any payments on a structured product are subject to the credit risk of the issuer and/or guarantor. Investors may lose their entire investment, i.e., incur an unlimited loss. The risks listed above are not complete. For a more comprehensive list of the risks involved with this particular product, please speak to your J.P. Morgan representative. If you are in any doubt about the risks involved in the product, you may clarify with the intermediary or seek independent professional advice.
We can help you navigate a complex financial landscape. Reach out today to learn how.
Contact usLEARN MORE About Our Firm and Investment Professionals Through FINRA BrokerCheck
To learn more about J.P. Morgan’s investment business, including our accounts, products and services, as well as our relationship with you, please review our J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Form CRS and Guide to Investment Services and Brokerage Products.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates (collectively "JPMCB") offer investment products, which may include bank-managed accounts and custody, as part of its trust and fiduciary services. Other investment products and services, such as brokerage and advisory accounts, are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS"), a member of FINRA and SIPC. Insurance products are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. JPMCB, JPMS and CIA are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.
Please read the Legal Disclaimer (for J.P. Morgan regional affiliates and other important information) and the relevant deposit protection schemes.