Alternative investing
4 Reasons for a resurgence in growth equity
Growth equity is getting interesting again. After a multi-year period of lackluster returns starting at the end of 2021, we believe growth equity—investments in mid- to late-stage private companies—now provides a compelling opportunity for investors.
There are several factors to thank for this: an increasing amount of value is accruing in private markets; meaningful growth potential in long-term secular themes, such as artificial intelligence (AI), healthcare innovation and defense technologies; revitalization in capital market activity leading to a recovery in distributions.
To boot: we believe we are at the outset of a Federal Reserve rate-cutting cycle that we expect will coincide with a resilient economy that avoids recession. This has historically been a constructive environment for growth equity funds that invest in mid- to late-stage companies.
Pulling these elements together, growth equity may be well positioned for improved performance that could offer investors access to opportunities that are less available in public markets. Investors with limited exposure to this space may not fully participate in potential opportunities that could arise in the current environment.
Let’s explore why.
Companies staying private for longer, creating significant value
Companies with the size and scale to IPO are staying private longer, creating meaningful value in the private markets. There are three reasons for this:
- An abundance of capital in private markets. Global private equity assets under management have risen over 15% a year over the past decade, and are expected to double over the next decade. That would produce a market size of around $25 trillion—about 70% the market cap of the Nasdaq1.
- Innovators’ desire to avoid public markets’ short-term focus and regulatory burden. The regulatory and reporting burden of going public, combined with the short-term orientation of listed markets, has reinforced the appeal of private capital. This dynamic explains why leading innovators are choosing to extend their time in private hands before pursuing an IPO.
- IPOs are not the only exit option. About 60% of U.S. venture capital (VC) exits, by value, are accomplished via buyouts and acquisition. Secondary markets are also maturing as pricing improves - over 50% of the late-stage growth rounds over the past six months have had a secondary component attached to the deal.2 (Exhibit 1).
VCs are looking beyond IPOs for exits
Exhibit 1: U.S. VC exits’ value, by type, 2015–2015
Source: Pitchbook, National Venture Capital Association, latest data available as of August 2025.
Why is this dynamic relevant?
Companies are staying private for longer at a time of a meaningful technological advancement—a stark contrast to historical norms.
Historically, there are four stages of a technological innovation cycle: infrastructure buildout (physical and digital), platform technology built on top (e.g., operating systems, cloud, APIs, foundational LLM models), and finally application to bring it to wide use (e.g., consumer and enterprise-facing products like search engines, e-commerce, AI copilots).
In the development of the internet and, later, cloud computing, value across all four stages was primarily found in public markets. Why? Infrastructure tends to be more capital intensive, and 20 years ago the private markets were too small to fund those needs. Private markets did play a bigger part at the application stage—where most of the value was created—although roughly 70% of the overall value creation occurred in public markets at that stage, as companies went public earlier (Exhibit 2).
More value is created in the private markets during the later stages of an innovation cycle
Exhibit 2: Public and private market value of large tech companies
Source: J.P. Morgan Private Bank, Bloomberg, September 2025. Estimates based on peak market capitalizations of key companies across each stage of the internet cycle as it is the most standard and widely available metric (physical and digital Infrastructure 2010; platform technology and applications 2022), with value broken out at segment-level for hyperscalers where available/relevant. Private market values are estimated from pre-2023 M&A transactions and late-stage funding round marks for representative firms where available and top-down estimates. Meant to be illustrative.
Tech companies now tend to be larger and older when they go public: the median age of a tech IPO is now ~14 years, when the company has median sales of about $220 million. That compares with ~7 years, and less than $20 million in revenue, in the late 1990s.3
Implications for today’s AI revolution
The speed of innovation in AI is unprecedented and the ultimate winners of the AI race may not yet exist. Innovation requires patient capital combined with strategic advice, and those exist primarily within growth equity. We believe investors who do not have exposure to growth equity may miss a meaningful amount of value creation in AI.
While a majority of the value thus far has accrued to the infrastructure players (e.g. semiconductors and hardware powering AI training and inference), we believe that in a similar way to how the prior tech innovation cycle unfolded, a majority of the value will accrue during the platform technology and application stages. This opportunity will be underpinned by the evolution of ‘software as a service’ to ‘services as software.’ This could represent a $3–5 trillion opportunity over the next five years, and upwards of $15 trillion over the next 10–15 years4. Indeed, we see artificial intelligence not as a sector-specific theme but as a broad-based force for innovation affecting nearly every industry. Promising emerging AI sub-sectors, in our view, include:
- Agentic AI—Agents can be thought of as autonomous “digital employees” with the potential to automate half of supply chain tasks by 2030.
- Horizontal AI software—AI has the potential to enable workflow automation across core business functions, such as customer relationship management (CRM).
- Vertical AI software—AI is already being integrated into industry-specific tools, and being used to create new ones.
- Industrial AI and automation—As part of a larger U.S. reindustrialization, industrial companies are expected to allocate 25%–30% of their capital expenditures to automation over the next five years, compared with just 15% average capex during the past five years.5
In contrast to the prior tech innovation cycles, however, we believe the majority of value created in the application stage will be in the private markets as a) ~95% of software companies are private and b) companies stay private for longer (and may not IPO at all). We are already seeing this playout in real-time: if the top three private companies by capitalization (SpaceX, ByteDance and OpenAI) were to go public, they would be among the top 30 S&P 500 companies, by market cap.
More than tech
Growth equity’s enduring appeal lies in its ability to capture long-term secular themes that are underrepresented or inaccessible in public markets. AI is a major theme, but we believe the opportunity is larger than that. Innovation in healthcare (drug engineering, digital health) and defense represent robust multi-year growth themes.
- Healthcare:
- We see an opportunity to speed drug development, as scientists move from testing compounds in a lab to using software to accurately model these interactions more quickly and at scale. Early studies indicate that AI could cut drug development timelines in half (typically a 15-plus year process) by improving productivity from drug discovery to clinical trials to regulatory processes.6
- AI can help improve operational efficiency throughout the healthcare system, streamlining or eliminating much of the paperwork that plagues healthcare providers, hospitals and researchers.
- Defense technology
- Autonomous/unmanned systems are transitioning from R&D to market-ready commercialization, driving adoption across defense and commercial markets .
- Next-generation cybersecurity, threat detection and AI-driven intelligence platforms are becoming essential as conflict moves into digital domains. Companies in these spaces are asset-light and software-driven and able to scale.
- While still early stages, satellites, launch services and secure communications are increasingly becoming mission-critical infrastructure.
- Energy and supply chain resilience: Securing supply chains and stable, efficient sources of power have become priorities for national security.
We believe the underlying growth potential of these themes will remain resilient regardless of the larger business cycle, as these businesses are increasingly perceived as critical to countries’ long-term economic competitiveness. To boot – private companies in high-conviction sectors, such as later stage software and healthcare businesses, trade at a meaningful discount to their public market counterparts, despite similar growth profiles.
Exit activity: Promising signs
Exit activity by founders and distributions to investors are both starting to look up. Global M&A and IPO volumes have begun to recover, albeit with IPOs concentrated in AI.
Importantly, M&A and buyouts continue to provide liquidity, while secondary markets are maturing. This includes transactions led by limited partners and also continuation vehicles and tender offers. This is critical as these other approaches offer additional exit options outside the public markets.
Sector-specific dealmaking is surging: AI-related private transactions topped $140 billion in the first half of this year, up dramatically from $25 billion in 2024.7 Software continues to account for roughly 40% of deal volume, peaking near 50% in 2025 (Exhibit 3).
Exit activity and distributions have improved
Exhibit 3: Global volume, M&A, IPOs and VC distribution yield, 2004–2025
Source: Pitchbook, National Venture Capital Association, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan Private Bank, June 2025.
For investors, recent returns have also been a concern. That said, history may offer growth equity investors a positive message. Rate-cutting cycles that avoid recessions—such as the one in the mid- to late-1990s—were periods of strong venture and growth performance. During that time, median returns were approximately 1.5x higher than the historical average.8 It is important to note that this is just one timeframe, but an important lesson from history nonetheless.
Lower short-term rates make future earnings more valuable today, boosting the valuation of companies that are expected to make most of their profits in the future. At the same time, lower interest rates make it less expensive for companies to hire, develop new products and make acquisitions—exactly the levers growth-stage companies tend to pull.
If current conditions follow this precedent, growth equity allocations could be entering a favorable regime (Exhibit 4).
Growth equity and VC IRRs above-average during rate cutting cycles in soft landings
Exhibit 4: Growth equity and VC returns
Source: Burgiss, Bloomberg, JP Morgan Private Bank. Latest data available as of August 2025. Fed cutting cycle years used: 1995, 1998, 2001, 2007, 2019, 2020. Returns used in vintage years that coincide with Fed cut and one year after, with the exception of 2019. Soft landing scenario indicates one timeframe (1995-2000). IRR: Internal rate of return.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
We can help
The growth equity market is at an inflection point. An increasing amount of value is being created in private markets, secular growth opportunities are accelerating, valuations remain attractive relative to public peers, and historical precedent suggests we could be entering a favorable macroeconomic environment for growth-oriented investments.
We believe it’s time to consider strategic allocations to growth equity (~10-25% of a private market portfolio allocation, depending on investor goals). With the potential for outsize returns to be concentrated among top managers, thoughtful selection and disciplined investment are critical to capturing what we expect to be the asset class’ resurgence.
To learn more about growth equity, and whether it may be appropriate for your portfolio, contact your J.P. Morgan team.
-
Preqin, J.P. Morgan Private Bank, Bloomberg. September 2025.
-
Pitchbook, National Venture Capital Association, “Venture Monitor: The definitive review of the US venture capital ecosystem”, Q1 2025.
-
Jay R. Ritter, Initial Public Offerings: Updated Statistics, Eugene F. Brigham Department of Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate, Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, July 2, 2025.
-
Vista Equity Partners, JP Morgan Private Bank, September 2025.
-
F. Ajewole, A. Kelkar, D. Moore, et al, “Unlocking the industrial potential of robotics and automation,” McKinsey & Company, 2023.
-
“Harnessing AI to Accelerate Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry,” Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, November 15, 2024.
-
Bloomberg Finance L.P., June 15, 2025.
-
MSCI, Burgiss, J.P. Morgan Private Bank, September 2025.
KEY RISKS
Investment in alternative investment strategies is speculative, often involves a greater degree of risk than traditional investments including limited liquidity and limited transparency, among other factors and should only be considered by sophisticated investors with the financial capability to accept the loss of all or part of the assets devoted to such strategies.
Private credit securities may be illiquid, present significant risks, and may be sold or redeemed at more or less than the original amount invested. There may be a heightened risk that private credit issuers and counterparties will not make payments on securities, repurchase agreements or other investments. Such defaults could result in losses to the strategy. In addition, the credit quality of securities held by the strategy may be lowered if an issuer’s financial condition changes. Lower credit quality may lead to greater volatility in the price of a security and in shares of the strategy. Lower credit quality also may affect liquidity and make it difficult for the strategy to sell the security. Private credit securities may be rated in the lowest investment grade category or not rated. Such securities are considered to have speculative characteristics similar to high yield securities, and issuers of such securities are more vulnerable to changes in economic conditions than issuers of higher-grade securities.
Real estate, hedge funds, and other private investments may not be suitable for all individual investors, may present significant risks, and may be sold or redeemed at more or less than the original amount invested. Private investments are offered only by offering memoranda, which more fully describe the possible risks. There are no assurances that the stated investment objectives of any investment product will be met. Hedge funds (or funds of hedge funds): often engage in leveraging and other speculative investment practices that may increase the risk of investment loss; can be highly illiquid; are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors; may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information; are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds; and often charge high fees. Further, any number of conflicts of interest may exist in the context of the management and/or operation of any hedge fund.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Here’s a look at a compelling investment opportunity set that may offer attractive potential now.
Sitara Sundar
Head of Alternative Investment Strategy & Market Intelligence
Published Sep 16, 2025
Experience the full possibility of your wealth
We can help you navigate a complex financial landscape. Reach out today to learn how.
Contact us
