Sustainable Investing

Scarcity Drives Returns: The Critical Resources Powering Markets

History rarely repeats, but it often rhymes. In 2022, markets were still digesting the aftershocks of a global pandemic when three events reframed the investment landscape: Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the passage of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, and the release of ChatGPT. Together, they brought renewed focus to three market-defining themes: defense, electrification, and artificial intelligence.

Exhibit 1: AI, electrification, and defense spending has expanded, with cash flowing to the suppliers of enabling resources

2026E spending levels as a multiple of 2022 levels | Free cash flow, 12-month forward rolling estimates, $ billion

Source: (LHS) (AI) J.P. Morgan Equity Strategy & Quantitative Research, Bloomberg Finance L.P., FactSet. Reflects consensus estimates for AI LTM related capex. Data as of August 10, 2026. (Electrification) BloombergNEF. Clean energy, electrified transport, electrified heat, clean industry, clean shipping, power grids. 2026E derived based on assumed linear growth from 2026-2030 in economic transition scenario projection. (Defense) J.P. Morgan Corporate and Investment Bank. Data as of January 2026. (RHS) Bloomberg Finance L.P. Hyperscalers = GOOGL, AMZN, META, MSFT. Semiconductors = NVDA, AVGO, MU, ASML. Data as of August 10, 2026.

Fast forward to today, and those themes have compounded. Agentic AI is intensifying demand for compute and power infrastructure, while conflict in the Middle East reinforces the premium markets place on energy security and defense readiness. As security becomes a priority, countries and companies are responding to a more fragmented world by rethinking where they build, whom they rely on, and how much redundancy they need. The global model is shifting from "just-in-time" to "just-in-case": efficiency still matters, but durable, redundant systems are becoming more valuable.

As AI, defense, and electrification scale together, they create overlapping demand for finite critical resources - from upstream minerals to downstream components and the skilled labor in between. For investors, the key question is no longer which themes have momentum, but what those themes require to keep growing, and where the resulting scarcity converts into pricing power, margin expansion, and competitive positioning. Investors who look beneath the headline trades to the bottlenecks that make them possible may find underappreciated pockets of opportunity.

Four ways to invest in scarcity

When a critical resource becomes scarce, companies and countries tend to respond in one of four ways – control what’s scarce, build around the bottleneck, position for the shock, or deliver the supply – and each opens a different kind of opportunity, and timeline, for investors.

1. Control what’s scarce

Scarcity is not only a function of how much of a resource exists, but also where it sits (both physically and industrially) and how those locations intersect with geopolitical and policy motives.

Critical minerals offer the clearest illustration, and they present two distinct forms of regional advantage that investors should treat separately. The first is the location of the resource itself. Chile and Peru together account for roughly 40% of global copper mine supply1, and Chile alone represents around 24%. 

Copper stands out as one of the few metals facing both strong demand growth and a looming supply deficit over the rest of the decade. It sits at the center of electrification, AI infrastructure, and defense modernization, yet supply is structurally constrained - ore grades are declining, new mines are increasingly capital-intensive, and discovery-to-production timelines routinely stretch beyond a decade. It is also difficult to replace at scale: aluminum, the closest alternative, carries only about 61% of copper's conductivity and often requires larger conductors, design changes, or performance tradeoffs2. Together, these dynamics support a bullish long-term thesis, and near-term catalysts sharpen the picture: El Niño-related flooding in Chile has forced major regional miners to cut 2026 production forecasts by 5–7%3.

Because asset quality and operational standards tend to drive miner valuations, producers with existing exposure to high-grade copper mines - or those consolidating via M&A - stand to strengthen their position in one of the most valuable and tightening mineral markets.

Exhibit 2: Copper stands out: high demand and short supply

Select transition metals, supply balances and expected demand growth through 2030

Source: J.P. Morgan Asset and Wealth Management, BloombergNEF. Demand = CAGR (2025-2030), Supply = % Surplus (Deficit) in 2030

Mined ore, however, is only the starting point. Copper must be smelted and refined to the purity that electrical applications demand before it can enter the wire, cable, transformers, and grid components that electrification and data centers consume. This capital-intensive, technically demanding step is where the second form of advantage emerges - and it is more geopolitical than geological.

While mined supply for many minerals is relatively diversified across countries, refining and processing are not. China occupies a category of its own here, controlling well over half of global refining capacity across a range of critical minerals. A material does not need to be physically rare to become strategically scarce. When one country controls the processing step that converts raw ore into usable input, the market prices that dependency regardless of where the ore is mined.

Exhibit 3: Critical minerals are mined globally, but refining remains highly concentrated

% of mined supply | % of refined supply

Source: International Energy Agency, International Manganese Institute, US Geological Survey, World Platinum Investment Council, BloombergNEF. In 2024.

This is why securing supply has become a defining policy objective. As globalization gives way to fragmentation, mineral resources now carry strategic value well beyond their pure economic value. Governments are increasingly moving to lock in supply through reshoring, friend-shoring, and backing national champions. That shift is evident in everything from the U.S. strategic stockpile "Project Vault"4 to China's export controls on rare earth elements. Significant concentration in any one link of the chain grants leverage to incumbent suppliers, especially when the commodity is critical to defense and energy, and governments increasingly deploy tariffs, price floors, offtake agreements, and direct equity stakes to secure it.

One live catalyst is the prospect of U.S. copper-tariff escalation, which incentivizes pre-emptive domestic stockpiling and pushes prices higher as China competes for the same finite supply. Corporates tied to strategically important minerals inherit a policy tailwind that compounds the underlying scarcity rather than competing against it.

In the near term, physical scarcity colliding with surging demand drives prices higher and rewards those who control strategic assets. But the longer a bottleneck persists, the greater the incentive to innovate around it.

2. Build around the bottleneck

Not every chokepoint lasts forever, though some persist because alternatives are too expensive, too early, or technically inferior. The advantage here is industrial - it accrues to the regions and companies with the manufacturing scale, cost position, and technological expertise to field a viable alternative faster than anyone else. Importantly, an alternative does not need to fully displace the incumbent to reset market pricing.

The U.S. power build-out for data centers illustrates the near-term version of this dynamic. Demand for high-efficiency combined-cycle gas turbines has run so far ahead of supply that the largest manufacturers are effectively sold out. The three main gas turbine suppliers accounted for an estimated 77% of the market in 2Q26, with some order books extending to 2030-31 and prices up 195% since 20195. However, the durable response to scarcity is not simply paying up indefinitely.

Rather than wait through lengthy grid connection timelines, developers seeking fast behind-the-meter power for data centers have turned to substitutes that industrial suppliers can deliver now, driving a marked influx of orders for reciprocating engines and aeroderivative turbines. Neither is a perfect replacement for a large frame turbine, but both are available, dispatchable, and well suited to modular on-site generation. This is the simplest form of working around a constraint: industrial expertise meeting surging demand precisely when the preferred supply is unavailable.

Battery storage is another example. Early lithium-ion cells relied on nickel-manganese-cobalt chemistries dependent on cobalt - a mineral concentrated in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where nearly 80% of global supply originates and where continuity and governance risk are acute. Chinese manufacturers leveraged their scale to commercialize lithium iron phosphate (LFP), a cobalt-free chemistry that, through sustained process improvement, became not only cheaper but technically superior on cycle life and thermal safety. LFP now accounts for the majority of global battery deployment, and prices remain roughly 36% below 2020 levels, with a further decline of about 33% expected by 20306.

Here the alternative was born from innovation rather than mere availability - working around supply-chain risk while improving performance. LFP may not be the final answer for every use case, though, and recent lithium price spikes have renewed interest in alternative chemistries.

Exhibit 4: Lithium-based batteries lead in market share, but we’re watching advancements in alternatives

Stationary storage by chemistry, gigawatt-hours

Source: BloombergNEF

Sodium-ion, for instance, is less exposed to constrained mineral supply and volatile commodity prices, and offers advantages in safety and low-temperature performance - though its lower energy density currently limits use in electric vehicles. But as stationary storage demand accelerates7 and U.S. enthusiasm for EVs cools, those disadvantages matter less. To take meaningful share from LFP, sodium-ion will need to demonstrate competitive learning rates and credible commercialization at scale.

The lesson from LFP is that whoever has already climbed the manufacturing learning curve is well positioned to capture the next transition. That leaves the Chinese manufacturers that scaled LFP to dominance positioned to propel a next-generation chemistry.

3. Position for the shock

When a shock actually hits, some are prepared and others are caught exposed – and that gap determines who absorbs the disruption and who benefits from it.

The clearest current example is the oil supply disruption in the Middle East. It has been relatively contained, with Brent averaging $90–95 since early March against fears of $200 crude8 that some experts voiced months ago. The reason traces back to deliberate investment in energy security.

China - a major oil consumer with about 50% of imports exposed to the Strait of Hormuz9 - buffered the shock with petroleum reserves covering roughly four months of imports, allowing stockpile drawdowns and refinery cuts when prices rise. Aggressive EV adoption is displacing oil demand outright: China's EVs and hybrids displaced 1.4 million barrels per day in 1H 2026, equivalent to roughly 6% of the nation's oil imports in 2025 and over 1% of total global oil demand10. These levers show that security is as much about the buffers a nation builds as the strategic assets that gain value during shocks.

Others, less prepared, must turn to alternatives. European and Asian buyers most exposed to a Strait of Hormuz interruption can no longer rely on those flows with confidence, and they are increasingly turning to other trade partners to secure supply. This is where the United States' lead in energy infrastructure - built through the shale and hydraulic-fracturing revolution - becomes most valuable. The U.S. exported 73 million metric tonnes of LNG between January and July, a 23% increase from last year, with South Korea, Japan, India, and China accounting for around 40% of American supplies during the first two months of the conflict in Iran11.

The dynamic rhymes directly with Europe's experience in 2022, when the bloc pivoted away from Russian pipeline gas toward U.S. LNG with remarkable speed. In both episodes, a supply shock rerouted global gas demand toward beneficiaries positioned across the U.S. value chain - in gas equipment, services, and export infrastructure. That same drilling expertise also provides traditional energy businesses with strategic advantages in high-growth, low-carbon markets such as enhanced geothermal systems, where those techniques are being applied to drill deeper into the Earth's crust and unlock greater energy potential.

Europe offers a different but complementary example of positioning, rooted in a long manufacturing heritage in the machinery and industrial equipment that other industries are built on. The region plans to double its electrification rate by 2040 under the EU's Electrification Action Plan, and its industrial base - spanning high-voltage grid infrastructure, electrical components, factory automation, and turbines - gives leading manufacturers a durable ability to sell into multiple high-growth end markets. Europe remains especially strong where intellectual property, engineering, and automation matter more than relatively higher energy costs.

These industrial leaders are well positioned for the reindustrialization now taking hold across Western markets, supplying the automation and efficiency systems that modernization requires alongside the electrical equipment that grids and data centers demand. Critically, this exposure ties to broad electrification and industrial-modernization themes rather than a narrow reliance on the AI trade - a more diversified demand profile that is itself a form of insulation.

4. Deliver the supply

At the base of it all sit the companies whose prior strategic investments and demonstrated execution convert every advantage above into realized supply. A credible track record signals competence, but it also reflects a deliberate effort to diversify risk away from any single end market and to redeploy hard-won expertise into new growth areas as demand evolves.

The U.S. energy example makes the point. A franchise levered entirely to LNG is exposed if demand surprises to the downside or if importing nations adapt away from gas over time, but the same operational know-how can be redirected toward adjacent growth markets. That transferability is what separates a durable franchise from a single-theme bet, allowing a company to stay relevant as the energy mix shifts rather than rising and falling with one commodity.

Engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) firms sit at the same intersection of execution and diversification. Rather than being tied to a single form of energy, the strongest EPCs carry exposure across the full spectrum of power construction - gas, renewables, and grids - supported by a track record and customer trust that come only from repeated, reliable execution. It is here that a labor bottleneck becomes most acute.

Constructing a complex combined-cycle gas plant or developing sprawling transmission lines requires skilled trade labor, and the U.S. construction industry currently faces a shortage of nearly 440,000 workers12 13. Firms that have built a genuine talent-retention advantage control one of the most critical and least replicable stages of the project development lifecycle.

For investors, that execution capacity offers a way to participate in the broader build-out without having to select every winning technology, chemistry, or supplier in advance, and ultimately success is measured less by the size of an announcement than by which projects convert into real, delivered supply.

In a market increasingly defined by scarcity, the beneficiaries are those that control what is needed, occupy the right place in the value chain, or build what the world cannot wait for.

The opportunities above are shown for illustrative purposes only. Their inclusion should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy or sell.

KEY RISKS

Investments in commodities may have greater volatility than investments in traditional securities, particularly if the instruments involve leverage. The value of commodity-linked derivative instruments may be affected by changes in overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates, or factors affecting a particular industry or commodity, such as drought, floods, weather, livestock disease, embargoes, tariffs and international economic, political and regulatory developments. Use of leveraged commodity-linked derivatives creates an opportunity for increased return but, at the same time, creates the possibility for greater loss.

Investing in emerging markets involves a greater degree of risk and increased volatility compared to developed markets. Changes in currency exchange rates and differences in accounting and taxation policies outside the investor’s jurisdiction can raise or lower returns. Some markets may not be as politically and economically stable, in addition to differences in taxation policies, and legal systems outside the investor’s jurisdiction may create additional risks. Investors should carefully consider these risks and consult with financial and legal advisors before investing in emerging markets.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

For illustrative purposes only. Estimates, forecasts and comparisons are as of the dates stated in the material. 

This material is for information purposes only, and may inform you of certain products and services offered by private banking businesses, part of JPMorgan Chase & Co. ("JPM"). Products and services described, as well as associated fees, charges and interest rates, are subject to change in accordance with the applicable account agreements and may differ among geographic locations. Not all products and services are offered at all locations.

GENERAL RISKS & CONSIDERATIONS

Any views, strategies or products discussed in this material may not be appropriate for all individuals and are subject to risks. Investors may get back less than they invested, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Asset allocation/diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss. Nothing in this material should be relied upon in isolation for the purpose of making an investment decision. You are urged to consider carefully whether the services, products, asset classes (e.g. equities, fixed income, alternative investments, commodities, etc.) or strategies discussed are suitable to your needs. You must also consider the objectives, risks, charges, and expenses associated with an investment service, product or strategy prior to making an investment decision. For this and more complete information, including discussion of your goals/situation, contact your J.P. Morgan team.

NON-RELIANCE

Certain information contained in this material is believed to be reliable; however, JPM does not represent or warrant its accuracy, reliability or completeness, or accept any liability for any loss or damage (whether direct or indirect) arising out of the use of all or any part of this material. No representation or warranty should be made with regard to any computations, graphs, tables, diagrams or commentary in this material, which are provided for illustration/reference purposes only. The views, opinions, estimates and strategies expressed in this material constitute our judgment based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. JPM assumes no duty to update any information in this material in the event that such information changes. Views, opinions, estimates and strategies expressed herein may differ from those expressed by other areas of JPM, views expressed for other purposes or in other contexts, and this material should not be regarded as a research report. Any projected results and risks are based solely on hypothetical examples cited, and actual results and risks will vary depending on specific circumstances. Forward-looking statements should not be considered as guarantees or predictions of future events.

Nothing in this document shall be construed as giving rise to any duty of care owed to, or advisory relationship with, you or any third party. Nothing in this document shall be regarded as an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice (whether financial, accounting, legal, tax or other) given by J.P. Morgan and/or its officers or employees, irrespective of whether or not such communication was given at your request. J.P. Morgan and its affiliates and employees do not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any financial transactions.

 

AI, electrification, and defense are colliding with finite supplies. Explore how scarcity in critical minerals, energy, infrastructure, and labor can drive pricing power and returns.

you may also like

Sep 18, 2026
The cost of capital is rising. Did stocks get the memo?

Experience the full possibility of your wealth

We can help you navigate a complex financial landscape. Reach out today to learn how.

Contact us

LEARN MORE About Our Firm and Investment Professionals Through FINRA BrokerCheck

 

To learn more about J.P. Morgan’s investment business, including our accounts, products and services, as well as our relationship with you, please review our J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Form CRS and Guide to Investment Services and Brokerage Products

 

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its affiliates (collectively "JPMCB") offer investment products, which may include bank-managed accounts and custody, as part of its trust and fiduciary services. Other investment products and services, such as brokerage and advisory accounts, are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS"), a member of FINRA and SIPC. Insurance products are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. JPMCB, JPMS and CIA are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.

 

Please read the Legal Disclaimer for J.P. Morgan Private Bank regional affiliates and other important information in conjunction with these pages.

INVESTMENT AND INSURANCE PRODUCTS ARE: • NOT FDIC INSURED • NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY • NOT A DEPOSIT OR OTHER OBLIGATION OF, OR GUARANTEED BY, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES • SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LOSS OF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INVESTED

Bank deposit products, such as checking, savings and bank lending and related services are offered by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Member FDIC.

Not a commitment to lend. All extensions of credit are subject to credit approval.

Equal Housing Lender Icon